# Investigating VLM Hallucination from a Cognitive Psychology Perspective: A First Step Toward Interpretation with Intriguing Observations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03123 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.03123/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 32 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Hallucination mitigation in LVLMs](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/hallucination-mitigation-in-lvlms/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03326/) (2024)
- [Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07332/) (2016)
- [Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10355/) (2023)
- [Expanding Performance Boundaries of Open-Source Multimodal Models with Model, Data, and Test-Time Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05271/) (2024)
- [Eyes Wide Shut? Exploring the Visual Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06209/) (2024)
- [Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decoding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16922/) (2023)
- [HallusionBench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.14566/) (2023)
- [Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.14565/) (2023)
- [Analyzing and Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00754/) (2023)
- [AMBER: An LLM-free Multi-dimensional Benchmark for MLLMs Hallucination Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.07397/) (2023)
- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02083/) (2023)
- [Ovis: Structural Embedding Alignment for Multimodal Large Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20797/) (2024)
- [Holistic Analysis of Hallucination in GPT-4V(ision): Bias and Interference Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.03287/) (2023)
- [Evaluating and Inducing Personality in Pre-trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07550/) (2022)
- [Who is GPT-3? An Exploration of Personality, Values and Demographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.14338/) (2022)
- [A Prompt Array Keeps the Bias Away: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Adversarial Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11933/) (2022)
- [Interpreting and Editing Vision-Language Representations to Mitigate Hallucinations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02762/) (2024)
- [Sycophancy in Large Language Models: Causes and Mitigations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15287/) (2024)
- [An Analysis of Visual Question Answering Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.09684/) (2017)
- [HI-TOM: A Benchmark for Evaluating Higher-Order Theory of Mind Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16755/) (2023)
- [When Large Language Models contradict humans? Large Language Models' Sycophantic Behaviour](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.09410/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models are Visual Reasoning Coordinators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15166/) (2023)
- [SocialCounterfactuals: Probing and Mitigating Intersectional Social Biases in Vision-Language Models with Counterfactual Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00825/) (2023)
- [Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Examining Performance of 11 State-of-the-Art models vs. Children Aged 7-10 on Advanced Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20320/) (2023)
- [Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models via Penalization of Language Priors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05262/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models with Psychometrics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.17675/) (2024)
- [Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models via Noise-Aware Preference Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17928/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [To See or To Please: Uncovering Visual Sycophancy and Split Beliefs in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.18373/) (2026)
- [To Agree or To Be Right? The Grounding-Sycophancy Tradeoff in Medical Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22623/) (2026)
- [GradeTrap: Authority Cues in Images Shift VLM Judgments Despite Explicit Instructions to Ignore Them](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.06058/) (2026)
- [Where Hallucinations Live: A Cross-Architecture Circuit in VQ-Tokenized Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.29048/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hallucination is a long-standing problem that has been actively investigated in Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Existing research commonly attributes hallucinations to technical limitations or sycophancy bias, where the latter means the models tend to generate incorrect answers to align with user expectations. However, these explanations primarily focus on technical or externally driven factors, and may have neglected the possibility that hallucination behaviours might mirror cognitive biases observed in human psychology. In this work, we introduce a psychological taxonomy, categorizing VLMs' cognitive biases that lead to hallucinations, including sycophancy, logical inconsistency, and a newly identified VLMs behaviour: appeal to authority. To systematically analyze these behaviours, we design AIpsych, a scalable benchmark that reveals psychological tendencies in model response patterns. Leveraging this benchmark, we investigate how variations in model architecture and parameter size influence model behaviour when responding to strategically manipulated questions. Our experiments reveal that as model size increases, VLMs exhibit stronger sycophantic tendencies but reduced authority bias, suggesting increasing competence but a potential erosion of response integrity. A human subject study further validates our hypotheses and highlights key behavioural differences between VLMs and human respondents. This work suggests a new perspective for understanding hallucination in VLMs and highlights the importance of integrating psychological principles into model evaluation.