# MedErr-CT: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark for Identifying and Correcting Errors in CT Reports

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19217 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19217/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.16860/) (2024)
- [DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03714/) (2023)
- [PathVQA: 30000+ Questions for Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.10286/) (2020)
- [SLAKE: A Semantically-Labeled Knowledge-Enhanced Dataset for Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.09542/) (2021)
- [PMC-VQA: Visual Instruction Tuning for Medical Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10415/) (2023)
- [MedXpertQA: Benchmarking Expert-Level Medical Reasoning and Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.18362/) (2025)
- [Generalist Foundation Models from a Multimodal Dataset for 3D Computed Tomography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.17834/) (2024)
- [OmniMedVQA: A New Large-Scale Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Medical LVLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.09181/) (2024)
- [Towards Generalist Foundation Model for Radiology by Leveraging Web-scale 2D&3D Medical Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02463/) (2023)
- [M3D: Advancing 3D Medical Image Analysis with Multi-Modal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.00578/) (2024)
- [GREEN: Generative Radiology Report Evaluation and Error Notation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.03595/) (2024)
- [GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03361/) (2024)
- [MEDEC: A Benchmark for Medical Error Detection and Correction in Clinical Notes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19260/) (2024)
- [Med3DVLM: An Efficient Vision-Language Model for 3D Medical Image Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20047/) (2025)
- [Automated Radiology Report Generation: A Review of Recent Advances](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10842/) (2024)
- [RadGenome-Chest CT: A Grounded Vision-Language Dataset for Chest CT Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16754/) (2024)
- [Next Token Prediction Towards Multimodal Intelligence: A Comprehensive Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18619/) (2024)
- [MedVH: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02730/) (2024)
- [3D-CT-GPT: Generating 3D Radiology Reports through Integration of Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19330/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [RADAR: A Multimodal Benchmark for 3D Image-Based Radiology Report Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.06681/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Computed Tomography (CT) plays a crucial role in clinical diagnosis, but the growing demand for CT examinations has raised concerns about diagnostic errors. While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate promising comprehension of medical knowledge, their tendency to produce inaccurate information highlights the need for rigorous validation. However, existing medical visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks primarily focus on simple visual recognition tasks, lacking clinical relevance and failing to assess expert-level knowledge. We introduce MedErr-CT, a novel benchmark for evaluating medical MLLMs' ability to identify and correct errors in CT reports through a VQA framework. The benchmark includes six error categories - four vision-centric errors (Omission, Insertion, Direction, Size) and two lexical error types (Unit, Typo) - and is organized into three task levels: classification, detection, and correction. Using this benchmark, we quantitatively assess the performance of state-of-the-art 3D medical MLLMs, revealing substantial variation in their capabilities across different error types. Our benchmark contributes to the development of more reliable and clinically applicable MLLMs, ultimately helping reduce diagnostic errors and improve accuracy in clinical practice. The code and datasets are available at https://github.com/babbu3682/MedErr-CT.