# Towards Group Fairness with Multiple Sensitive Attributes in Federated Foundation Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18732 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18732/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 30 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.04977/) (2019)
- [FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.00857/) (2021)
- [Rethinking Architecture Design for Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06047/) (2021)
- [Fairness-aware Agnostic Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05057/) (2020)
- [When Foundation Model Meets Federated Learning: Motivations, Challenges, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15546/) (2023)
- [Causal machine learning for predicting treatment outcomes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.08770/) (2024)
- [Towards Fairness-Aware Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.01872/) (2021)
- [Improving Fairness in AI Models on Electronic Health Records: The Case for Federated Learning Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11386/) (2023)
- [Causal Discovery for Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.06685/) (2022)
- [FAIR-FATE: Fair Federated Learning with Momentum](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.13678/) (2022)
- [GLOCALFAIR: Jointly Improving Global and Local Group Fairness in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.03562/) (2024)
- [Trustworthy Federated Learning: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11537/) (2023)
- [A Survey on Group Fairness in Federated Learning: Challenges, Taxonomy of Solutions and Directions for Future Research](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03855/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The deep integration of foundation models (FM) with federated learning (FL) enhances personalization and scalability for diverse downstream tasks, making it crucial in sensitive domains like healthcare. Achieving group fairness has become an increasingly prominent issue in the era of federated foundation models (FFMs), since biases in sensitive attributes might lead to inequitable treatment for under-represented demographic groups. Existing studies mostly focus on achieving fairness with respect to a single sensitive attribute. This renders them unable to provide clear interpretability of dependencies among multiple sensitive attributes which is required to achieve group fairness. Our paper takes the first attempt towards a causal analysis of the relationship between group fairness across various sensitive attributes in the FFM. We extend the FFM structure to trade off multiple sensitive attributes simultaneously and quantify the causal effect behind the group fairness through causal discovery and inference. Extensive experiments validate its effectiveness, offering insights into interpretability towards building trustworthy and fair FFM systems.
