# Context Biasing for Pronunciation-Orthography Mismatch in Automatic Speech Recognition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.18703 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18703/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04356/) (2022)
- [Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.07909/) (2015)
- [Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.06670/) (2019)
- [FLEURS: Few-shot Learning Evaluation of Universal Representations of Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12446/) (2022)
- [VoxPopuli: A Large-Scale Multilingual Speech Corpus for Representation Learning, Semi-Supervised Learning and Interpretation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00390/) (2021)
- [Multilingual Translation with Extensible Multilingual Pretraining and Finetuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.00401/) (2020)
- [Deep context: end-to-end contextual speech recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.02480/) (2018)
- [An analysis of incorporating an external language model into a sequence-to-sequence model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01996/) (2017)
- [Contextualized Streaming End-to-End Speech Recognition with Trie-Based Deep Biasing and Shallow Fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.02194/) (2021)
- [Cold Fusion: Training Seq2Seq Models Together with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.06426/) (2017)
- [Contextual RNN-T For Open Domain ASR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.03411/) (2020)
- [Earnings-21: A Practical Benchmark for ASR in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.11348/) (2021)
- [YODAS: Youtube-Oriented Dataset for Audio and Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00899/) (2024)
- [Very Deep Self-Attention Networks for End-to-End Speech Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.13377/) (2019)
- [Class LM and word mapping for contextual biasing in End-to-End ASR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.05609/) (2020)
- [Improving End-to-End Contextual Speech Recognition with Fine-Grained Contextual Knowledge Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12806/) (2022)
- [Contextualized End-to-End Speech Recognition with Contextual Phrase Prediction Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12493/) (2023)
- [Instant One-Shot Word-Learning for Context-Specific Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Speech Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.02268/) (2021)
- [PromptASR for contextualized ASR with controllable style](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.07414/) (2023)
- [Contextualized Automatic Speech Recognition with Attention-Based Bias Phrase Boosted Beam Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.10449/) (2024)
- [LCB-net: Long-Context Biasing for Audio-Visual Speech Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06390/) (2024)
- [OWSM-Biasing: Contextualizing Open Whisper-Style Speech Models for Automatic Speech Recognition with Dynamic Vocabulary](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09448/) (2025)
- [Continuously Learning New Words in Automatic Speech Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04482/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Neural sequence-to-sequence systems deliver state-of-the-art performance for automatic speech recognition. When using appropriate modeling units, e.g., byte-pair encoding, these systems are in principle open vocabulary systems. In practice, however, they often fail to recognize words not seen during training, e.g., named entities, acronyms, or domain-specific special words. To address this problem, many context biasing methods have been proposed; however, these methods may still struggle when they are unable to relate audio and corresponding text, e.g., in case of a pronunciation-orthography mismatch. We propose a method where corrections of substitution errors can be used to improve the recognition accuracy of such challenging words. Users can add corrections on the fly during inference. We show that with this method we get a relative improvement in biased word error rate between 22% and 34% compared to a text-based replacement method, while maintaining the overall performance.
