# PNCS:Power-Norm Cosine Similarity for Diverse Client Selection in Federated Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15923 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15923/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1556/) (2014)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.05492/) (2016)
- [On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02189/) (2019)
- [A Brief Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.05866/) (2017)
- [Active Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12641/) (2019)
- [Fast-Convergent Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.13137/) (2020)
- [FedCor: Correlation-Based Active Client Selection Strategy for Heterogeneous Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.13822/) (2021)
- [Deep Reinforcement Learning Assisted Federated Learning Algorithm for Data Management of IIoT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.03575/) (2022)
- [Fairness-Aware Client Selection for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.10738/) (2023)
- [Budgeted Online Selection of Candidate IoT Clients to Participate in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.09849/) (2020)
- [Client Selection in Federated Learning based on Gradients Importance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.11204/) (2021)
- [Gradient Coreset for Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06989/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for leveraging diverse datasets from multiple sources while preserving data privacy by avoiding centralized storage. However, many existing approaches fail to account for the intricate gradient correlations between remote clients, a limitation that becomes especially problematic in data heterogeneity scenarios. In this work, we propose a novel FL framework utilizing Power-Norm Cosine Similarity (PNCS) to improve client selection for model aggregation. By capturing higher-order gradient moments, PNCS addresses non-IID data challenges, enhancing convergence speed and accuracy. Additionally, we introduce a simple algorithm ensuring diverse client selection through a selection history queue. Experiments with a VGG16 model across varied data partitions demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods.
