# A Survey on LLM-Assisted Clinical Trial Recruitment

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15301 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.15301/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 35 of its 131 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Qwen Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.16609/) (2023)
- [BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08746/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.13138/) (2022)
- [LLaVA-Med: Training a Large Language-and-Vision Assistant for Biomedicine in One Day](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00890/) (2023)
- [Domain-Specific Language Model Pretraining for Biomedical Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.15779/) (2020)
- [Capabilities of GPT-4 on Medical Challenge Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13375/) (2023)
- [BioGPT: Generative Pre-trained Transformer for Biomedical Text Generation and Mining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10341/) (2022)
- [From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08164/) (2022)
- [MedAlpaca -- An Open-Source Collection of Medical Conversational AI Models and Training Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08247/) (2023)
- [Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expert](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.01862/) (2020)
- [MedCPT: Contrastive Pre-trained Transformers with Large-scale PubMed Search Logs for Zero-shot Biomedical Information Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00589/) (2023)
- [Empowering Biomedical Discovery with AI Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02831/) (2024)
- [Pre-trained Language Models in Biomedical Domain: A Systematic Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05006/) (2021)
- [COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08765/) (2020)
- [Zero-Shot Clinical Trial Patient Matching with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05125/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16756/) (2023)
- [Scaling Clinical Trial Matching Using Large Language Models: A Case Study in Oncology](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02180/) (2023)
- [NLI4CT: Multi-Evidence Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trial Reports](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03598/) (2023)
- [The Leaf Clinical Trials Corpus: a new resource for query generation from clinical trial eligibility criteria](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.13757/) (2022)
- [CliniDigest: A Case Study in Large Language Model Based Large-Scale Summarization of Clinical Trial Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.14522/) (2023)
- [AUTOCT: Automating Interpretable Clinical Trial Prediction with LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04293/) (2025)
- [Clinical Trial Information Extraction with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10027/) (2021)
- [Effective Matching of Patients to Clinical Trials using Entity Extraction and Neural Re-ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.00381/) (2023)
- [Leveraging Large Language Models for Medical Information Extraction and Query Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.23851/) (2024)
- [TrialDura: Hierarchical Attention Transformer for Interpretable Clinical Trial Duration Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.13235/) (2024)
- [Information Extraction of Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.07296/) (2020)
- [From RAGs to riches: Utilizing large language models to write documents for clinical trials](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16406/) (2024)
- [Controlled LLM-based Reasoning for Clinical Trial Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.18998/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Disentangling Ambiguity from Instability in Large Language Models: A Clinical Text-to-SQL Case Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12015/) (2026)
- [Neurosymbolic Clinical Trial Matching via LLM-Driven Abduction and Logical Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.20895/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in LLMs have greatly improved general-domain NLP tasks. Yet, their adoption in critical domains, such as clinical trial recruitment, remains limited. As trials are designed in natural language and patient data is represented as both structured and unstructured text, the task of matching trials and patients benefits from knowledge aggregation and reasoning abilities of LLMs. Classical approaches are trial-specific and LLMs with their ability to consolidate distributed knowledge hold the potential to build a more general solution. Yet recent applications of LLM-assisted methods rely on proprietary models and weak evaluation benchmarks. In this survey, we are the first to analyze the task of trial-patient matching and contextualize emerging LLM-based approaches in clinical trial recruitment. We critically examine existing benchmarks, approaches and evaluation frameworks, the challenges to adopting LLM technologies in clinical research and exciting future directions.
