# Generalized Reference Kernel With Negative Samples For Support Vector One-class Classification

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14895 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14895/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04606/) (2018)
- [DROCC: Deep Robust One-Class Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.12718/) (2020)
- [Revisiting the Nystrom Method for Improved Large-Scale Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1303.1849/) (2013)
- [A Random Matrix Analysis of Random Fourier Features: Beyond the Gaussian Kernel, a Precise Phase Transition, and the Corresponding Double Descent](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.05013/) (2020)
- [Graph-Embedded Subspace Support Vector Data Description](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.14370/) (2021)
- [Generalized Reference Kernel for One-class Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00534/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper focuses on small-scale one-class classification with some negative samples available. We propose Generalized Reference Kernel with Negative Samples (GRKneg) for One-class Support Vector Machine (OC-SVM). We study different ways to select/generate the reference vectors and recommend an approach for the problem at hand. It is worth noting that the proposed method does not use any labels in the model optimization but uses the original OC-SVM implementation. Only the kernel used in the process is improved using the negative data. We compare our method with the standard OC-SVM and with the binary Support Vector Machine (SVM) using different amounts of negative samples. Our approach consistently outperforms the standard OC-SVM using Radial Basis Function kernel. When there are plenty of negative samples, the binary SVM outperforms the one-class approaches as expected, but we show that for the lowest numbers of negative samples the proposed approach clearly outperforms the binary SVM.
