# RAGtifier: Evaluating RAG Generation Approaches of State-of-the-Art RAG Systems for the SIGIR LiveRAG Competition

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14412 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14412/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in RAG pipeline design and evaluation, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation.
- Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG pipeline design and evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-pipeline-design-and-evaluation/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [When Not to Trust Language Models: Investigating Effectiveness of Parametric and Non-Parametric Memories](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10511/) (2022)
- [Measuring and Narrowing the Compositionality Gap in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03350/) (2022)
- [M3-Embedding: Multi-Linguality, Multi-Functionality, Multi-Granularity Text Embeddings Through Self-Knowledge Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03216/) (2024)
- [Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.15217/) (2023)
- [Justice or Prejudice? Quantifying Biases in LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02736/) (2024)
- [JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17631/) (2023)
- [The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14887/) (2024)
- [Trust or Escalate: LLM Judges with Provable Guarantees for Human Agreement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18370/) (2024)
- [InstructRAG: Instructing Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Self-Synthesized Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13629/) (2024)
- [CRAG -- Comprehensive RAG Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.04744/) (2024)
- [Information Retrieval: Recent Advances and Beyond](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.08801/) (2023)
- [Style Outweighs Substance: Failure Modes of LLM Judges in Alignment Benchmarking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15268/) (2024)
- [Stochastic RAG: End-to-End Retrieval-Augmented Generation through Expected Utility Maximization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.02816/) (2024)
- [Generating Diverse Q&A Benchmarks for RAG Evaluation with DataMorgana](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12789/) (2025)
- [SUNAR: Semantic Uncertainty based Neighborhood Aware Retrieval for Complex QA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.17990/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [SIGIR 2025 -- LiveRAG Challenge Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04942/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enriches Large Language Models (LLMs) by combining their internal, parametric knowledge with external, non-parametric sources, with the goal of improving factual correctness and minimizing hallucinations. The LiveRAG 2025 challenge explores RAG solutions to maximize accuracy on DataMorgana's QA pairs, which are composed of single-hop and multi-hop questions. The challenge provides access to sparse OpenSearch and dense Pinecone indices of the Fineweb 10BT dataset. It restricts model use to LLMs with up to 10B parameters and final answer generation with Falcon-3-10B. A judge-LLM assesses the submitted answers along with human evaluators. By exploring distinct retriever combinations and RAG solutions under the challenge conditions, our final solution emerged using InstructRAG in combination with a Pinecone retriever and a BGE reranker. Our solution achieved a correctness score of 1.13 and a faithfulness score of 0.55 in the non-human evaluation, placing it overall in third place in the SIGIR 2025 LiveRAG Challenge.