# MIST: Towards Multi-dimensional Implicit BiaS Evaluation of LLMs for Theory of Mind

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.14161 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14161/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.08193/) (2021)
- [Towards Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10403/) (2022)
- [Societal Biases in Language Generation: Progress and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.04054/) (2021)
- ["Kelly is a Warm Person, Joseph is a Role Model": Gender Biases in LLM-Generated Reference Letters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.09219/) (2023)
- [Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.14921/) (2023)
- [LLMs are Biased Teachers: Evaluating LLM Bias in Personalized Education](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14012/) (2024)
- [Unmasking Implicit Bias: Evaluating Persona-Prompted LLM Responses in Power-Disparate Social Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01532/) (2025)
- [Evaluating MLLMs with Multimodal Multi-image Reasoning Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04280/) (2025)
- [Rethinking Theory of Mind Benchmarks for LLMs: Towards A User-Centered Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10839/) (2025)
- [DECASTE: Unveiling Caste Stereotypes in Large Language Models through Multi-Dimensional Bias Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.14971/) (2025)
- [Multi-ToM: Evaluating Multilingual Theory of Mind Capabilities in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15999/) (2024)
- [Profiling Bias in LLMs: Stereotype Dimensions in Contextual Word Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16527/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [OmniHallu: Unified Hallucination Detection for Cross-Modal Comprehension and Generation in Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.11244/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Theory of Mind (ToM) in Large Language Models (LLMs) refers to the model's ability to infer the mental states of others, with failures in this ability often manifesting as systemic implicit biases. Assessing this challenge is difficult, as traditional direct inquiry methods are often met with refusal to answer and fail to capture its subtle and multidimensional nature. Therefore, we propose MIST, which reconceptualizes the content model of stereotypes into multidimensional failures of ToM, specifically in the domains of competence, sociability, and morality. The framework introduces two indirect tasks. The Word Association Bias Test (WABT) assesses implicit lexical associations, while the Affective Attribution Test (AAT) measures implicit emotional tendencies, aiming to uncover latent stereotypes without triggering model avoidance. Through extensive experimentation on eight state-of-the-art LLMs, our framework demonstrates the ability to reveal complex bias structures and improved robustness. All data and code will be released.