# AssistedDS: Benchmarking How External Domain Knowledge Assists LLMs in Automated Data Science

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13992 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13992/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 25 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Generalization through Memorization: Nearest Neighbor Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.00172/) (2019)
- [Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15595/) (2023)
- [AIDE: AI-Driven Exploration in the Space of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13138/) (2025)
- [Data Interpreter: An LLM Agent For Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18679/) (2024)
- [InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.05507/) (2024)
- [DSBench: How Far Are Data Science Agents from Becoming Data Science Experts?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.07703/) (2024)
- [Beyond the Limits: A Survey of Techniques to Extend the Context Length in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02244/) (2024)
- [AutoKaggle: A Multi-Agent Framework for Autonomous Data Science Competitions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.20424/) (2024)
- [How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.06684/) (2020)
- [DataSciBench: An LLM Agent Benchmark for Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13897/) (2025)
- [How Data Scientists Work Together With Domain Experts in Scientific Collaborations: To Find The Right Answer Or To Ask The Right Question?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03486/) (2019)
- [Long Context vs. RAG for LLMs: An Evaluation and Revisits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.01880/) (2024)
- [SPIO: Ensemble and Selective Strategies via LLM-Based Multi-Agent Planning in Automated Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23314/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Why Do Open-Source LLMs Struggle with Data Analysis? A Systematic Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19794/) (2025)
- [Measuring Data Science Automation: A Survey of Evaluation Tools for AI Assistants and Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08800/) (2025)
- [LongDS-Bench: On the Failure of Long-Horizon Agentic Data Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.30434/) (2026)
- [Can Agentic AI Match the Performance of Human Data Scientists?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.20959/) (2025)
- [An LLM-based Agentic Framework for Accessible Network Control](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.20600/) (2025)
- [AgentDS Technical Report: Benchmarking the Future of Human-AI Collaboration in Domain-Specific Data Science](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.19005/) (2026)
- [Nonuniformity Principle in Human-AI Coworking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.16530/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the automation of data science workflows. Yet it remains unclear whether they can critically leverage external domain knowledge as human data scientists do in practice. To answer this question, we introduce AssistedDS (Assisted Data Science), a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate how LLMs handle domain knowledge in tabular prediction tasks. AssistedDS features both synthetic datasets with explicitly known generative mechanisms and real-world Kaggle competitions, each accompanied by curated bundles of helpful and adversarial documents. These documents provide domain-specific insights into data cleaning, feature engineering, and model selection. We assess state-of-the-art LLMs on their ability to discern and apply beneficial versus harmful domain knowledge, evaluating submission validity, information recall, and predictive performance. Our results demonstrate three key findings: (1) LLMs frequently exhibit an uncritical adoption of provided information, significantly impairing their predictive performance when adversarial content is introduced, (2) helpful guidance is often insufficient to counteract the negative influence of adversarial information, and (3) in Kaggle datasets, LLMs often make errors in handling time-series data, applying consistent feature engineering across different folds, and interpreting categorical variables correctly. These findings highlight a substantial gap in current models' ability to critically evaluate and leverage expert knowledge, underscoring an essential research direction for developing more robust, knowledge-aware automated data science systems. Our data and code are publicly available here: https://github.com/jeremyxianx/Assisted-DS