# Enhancing Goal-oriented Proactive Dialogue Systems via Consistency Reflection and Correction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13366 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13366/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10560/) (2022)
- [Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phone](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.14219/) (2024)
- [WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.12244/) (2023)
- [Towards Conversational Recommendation over Multi-Type Dialogs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03954/) (2020)
- [BoB: BERT Over BERT for Training Persona-based Dialogue Models from Limited Personalized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.06169/) (2021)
- [DuRecDial 2.0: A Bilingual Parallel Corpus for Conversational Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.08877/) (2021)
- [A Unified Multi-task Learning Framework for Multi-goal Conversational Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06923/) (2022)
- [Target-oriented Proactive Dialogue Systems with Personalization: Problem Formulation and Dataset Curation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07397/) (2023)
- [Reasoning Like a Doctor: Improving Medical Dialogue Systems via Diagnostic Reasoning Process Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.13934/) (2024)
- [Dialogue Planning via Brownian Bridge Stochastic Process for Goal-directed Proactive Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.05290/) (2023)
- [SimOAP: Improve Coherence and Consistency in Persona-based Dialogue Generation via Over-sampling and Post-evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11130/) (2023)
- [Follow Me: Conversation Planning for Target-driven Recommendation Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.03516/) (2022)
- [Target-constrained Bidirectional Planning for Generation of Target-oriented Proactive Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06063/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SimRPD: Optimizing Recruitment Proactive Dialogue Agents through Simulator-Based Data Evaluation and Selection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.02871/) (2026)
- [Enhancing Target-Guided Proactive Dialogue Systems via Conversational Scenario Modeling and Intent-Keyword Bridging](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.11964/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Goal-oriented proactive dialogue systems are designed to guide user conversations seamlessly towards specific objectives by planning a goal-oriented path. However, previous research has focused predominantly on optimizing these paths while neglecting the inconsistencies that may arise between generated responses and dialogue contexts, including user profiles, dialogue history, domain knowledge, and subgoals. To address this issue, we introduce a model-agnostic two-stage Consistency Reflection and Correction (CRC) framework. Specifically, in the consistency reflection stage, the model is prompted to reflect on the discrepancies between generated responses and dialogue contexts, identifying inconsistencies and suggesting possible corrections. In the consistency correction stage, the model generates responses that are more consistent with the dialogue context based on these reflection results. We conducted experiments on various model architectures with different parameter sizes, including encoder-decoder models (BART, T5) and decoder-only models (GPT-2, DialoGPT, Phi3, Mistral and LLaMA3), and the experimental results on three datasets demonstrate that our CRC framework significantly improves the consistency between generated responses and dialogue contexts.