# Complexity Scaling Laws for Neural Models using Combinatorial Optimization

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12932 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12932/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 45 of its 76 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.15556/) (2022)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.10902/) (2019)
- [Scaling Laws for Reward Model Overoptimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.10760/) (2022)
- [Scaling Vision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04560/) (2021)
- [Pointer Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.03134/) (2015)
- [Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01815/) (2017)
- [Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1603.06560/) (2016)
- [Deep Learning Scaling is Predictable, Empirically](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.00409/) (2017)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.15004/) (2023)
- [Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.14701/) (2020)
- [Leveraging Procedural Generation to Benchmark Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.01588/) (2019)
- [BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.01774/) (2018)
- [Explaining Neural Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.06701/) (2021)
- [Scaling Laws for Transfer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.01293/) (2021)
- [Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01169/) (2022)
- [SMAC3: A Versatile Bayesian Optimization Package for Hyperparameter Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09831/) (2021)
- [Multi-Game Decision Transformers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15241/) (2022)
- [A Constructive Prediction of the Generalization Error Across Scales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.12673/) (2019)
- [Scaling Laws and Interpretability of Learning from Repeated Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.10487/) (2022)
- [Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07608/) (2023)
- [The Quantization Model of Neural Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.13506/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Neural Scaling Laws in Language and Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.06640/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Machine Translation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.07740/) (2021)
- [A Dynamical Model of Neural Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01092/) (2024)
- [Broken Neural Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.14891/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Efficient Decoder Scaling Strategy for Neural Routing Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00430/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work on neural scaling laws demonstrates that model performance scales predictably with compute budget, model size, and dataset size. In this work, we develop scaling laws based on problem complexity. We analyze two fundamental complexity measures: solution space size and representation space size. Using the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) as a case study, we show that combinatorial optimization promotes smooth cost trends, and therefore meaningful scaling laws can be obtained even in the absence of an interpretable loss. We then show that suboptimality grows predictably for fixed-size models when scaling the number of TSP nodes or spatial dimensions, independent of whether the model was trained with reinforcement learning or supervised fine-tuning on a static dataset. We conclude with an analogy to problem complexity scaling in local search, showing that a much simpler gradient descent of the cost landscape produces similar trends.
