# NAP-Tuning: Neural Augmented Prompt Tuning for Adversarially Robust Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.12706 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.12706/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 32 of its 43 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/mllm-jailbreaks-and-adversarial-robustness/)
- LLM safety and security / [Vision-language and text-to-image safety](https://mlsanity.com/safety/vision-language-and-text-to-image-safety/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 32)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.0575/) (2014)
- [Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.06083/) (2017)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03744/) (2023)
- [Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.00190/) (2021)
- [Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05918/) (2021)
- [Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01134/) (2021)
- [Describing Textures in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1311.3618/) (2013)
- [Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraft](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1306.5151/) (2013)
- [Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.08573/) (2019)
- [EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00029/) (2017)
- [Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.01690/) (2020)
- [Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.05557/) (2022)
- [P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.07602/) (2021)
- [MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03117/) (2022)
- [Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.06978/) (2018)
- [Adversarially Robust Generalization Requires More Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.11285/) (2018)
- [Enhancing the Transferability of Adversarial Attacks through Variance Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.15571/) (2021)
- [Eigen-CAM: Class Activation Map using Principal Components](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.00299/) (2020)
- [Understanding Zero-Shot Adversarial Robustness for Large-Scale Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.07016/) (2022)
- [Rethinking Model Ensemble in Transfer-based Adversarial Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.09105/) (2023)
- [PromptKD: Unsupervised Prompt Distillation for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.02781/) (2024)
- [Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11261/) (2023)
- [Few-Shot Adversarial Prompt Learning on Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.14774/) (2024)
- [A Frustratingly Simple Yet Highly Effective Attack Baseline: Over 90% Success Rate Against the Strong Black-box Models of GPT-4.5/4o/o1](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10635/) (2025)
- [R-TPT: Improving Adversarial Robustness of Vision-Language Models through Test-Time Prompt Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.11195/) (2025)
- [TAPT: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning for Robust Inference in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.13136/) (2024)
- [CLIP is Strong Enough to Fight Back: Test-time Counterattacks towards Zero-shot Adversarial Robustness of CLIP](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.03613/) (2025)
- [Improved Visual Fine-tuning with Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.01489/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [Feature-Space Smoothing: Certified Robustness of Deep Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.16200/) (2026)
- [What Makes VLMs Robust? Towards Reconciling Robustness and Accuracy in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.12799/) (2026)
- [TAME: Test-Time Adversarial Prompt Tuning via Mixture-of-Experts for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.17577/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding relationships between visual and textual data through joint embedding spaces. Despite their effectiveness, these models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks, particularly in the image modality, posing significant security concerns. Building upon our previous work on Adversarial Prompt Tuning (AdvPT), which introduced learnable text prompts to enhance adversarial robustness in VLMs without extensive parameter training, we present a significant extension by introducing the Neural Augmentor framework for Multi-modal Adversarial Prompt Tuning (NAP-Tuning).Our key innovations include: (1) extending AdvPT from text-only to multi-modal prompting across both text and visual modalities, (2) expanding from single-layer to multi-layer prompt architectures, and (3) proposing a novel architecture-level redesign through our Neural Augmentor approach, which implements feature purification to directly address the distortions introduced by adversarial attacks in feature space. Our NAP-Tuning approach incorporates token refiners that learn to reconstruct purified features through residual connections, allowing for modality-specific and layer-specific feature correction.Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that NAP-Tuning significantly outperforms existing methods across various datasets and attack types. Notably, our approach shows significant improvements over the strongest baselines under the challenging AutoAttack benchmark, outperforming them by 33.5% on ViT-B16 and 33.0% on ViT-B32 architectures while maintaining competitive clean accuracy.