# Evaluating BiLSTM and CNN+GRU Approaches for Human Activity Recognition Using WiFi CSI Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.11165 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.11165/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 2 of its 14 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [SenseFi: A Library and Benchmark on Deep-Learning-Empowered WiFi Human Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.07859/) (2022)
- [A Survey of Human Activity Recognition in Smart Homes Based on IoT Sensors Algorithms: Taxonomies, Challenges, and Opportunities with Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.04418/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

This paper compares the performance of BiLSTM and CNN+GRU deep learning models for Human Activity Recognition (HAR) on two WiFi-based Channel State Information (CSI) datasets: UT-HAR and NTU-Fi HAR. The findings indicate that the CNN+GRU model has a higher accuracy on the UT-HAR dataset (95.20%) thanks to its ability to extract spatial features. In contrast, the BiLSTM model performs better on the high-resolution NTU-Fi HAR dataset (92.05%) by extracting long-term temporal dependencies more effectively. The findings strongly emphasize the critical role of dataset characteristics and preprocessing techniques in model performance improvement. We also show the real-world applicability of such models in applications like healthcare and intelligent home systems, highlighting their potential for unobtrusive activity recognition.