# UTBoost: Rigorous Evaluation of Coding Agents on SWE-Bench

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.09289 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09289/

## Key facts

- Cited by 45 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 10 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Software engineering coding agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/software-engineering-coding-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06770/) (2023)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [SWE-Bench+: Enhanced Coding Benchmark for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06992/) (2024)
- [RepoGraph: Enhancing AI Software Engineering with Repository-level Code Graph](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.14684/) (2024)
- [HyperAgent: Generalist Software Engineering Agents to Solve Coding Tasks at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.16299/) (2024)
- [Evaluating Software Development Agents: Patch Patterns, Code Quality, and Issue Complexity in Real-World GitHub Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12468/) (2024)
- [Infant Agent: A Tool-Integrated, Logic-Driven Agent with Cost-Effective API Usage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.01114/) (2024)
- [Intramorphic Testing: A New Approach to the Test Oracle Problem](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.11228/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Establishing Best Practices for Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.02825/) (2025)
- [LongCLI-Bench: A Preliminary Benchmark and Study for Long-horizon Agentic Programming in Command-Line Interfaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.14337/) (2026)
- [BenchGuard: Who Guards the Benchmarks? Automated Auditing of LLM Agent Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.24955/) (2026)
- [The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22862/) (2026)
- [Do Androids Dream of Breaking the Game? Systematically Auditing AI Agent Benchmarks with BenchJack](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.12673/) (2026)
- [Pervasive Annotation Errors Break Text-to-SQL Benchmarks and Leaderboards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08778/) (2026)
- [Automated Benchmark Auditing for AI Agents and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26079/) (2026)
- [FALAT: Tracing Failures in LLM Agent Trajectories via Dependency-Guided Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.00765/) (2026)
- [SkillMaster: Toward Autonomous Skill Mastery in LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08693/) (2026)
- [SWE-Factory: Your Automated Factory for Issue Resolution Training Data and Evaluation Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.10954/) (2025)
- [VeriEquivBench: An Equivalence Score for Ground-Truth-Free Evaluation of Formally Verifiable Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06296/) (2025)
- [Agentic Software Issue Resolution with Large Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.22256/) (2025)
- [ABC-Bench: Benchmarking Agentic Backend Coding in Real-World Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.11077/) (2026)
- [Dynamic Cogeneration of Bug Reproduction Test in Agentic Program Repair](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19066/) (2026)
- [Scalable Supervision for Software Agents via Patch Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22775/) (2025)
- [Noisy Data is Destructive to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16140/) (2026)
- [SWE-Cycle: Benchmarking Code Agents across the Complete Issue Resolution Cycle](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.13139/) (2026)
- [Anchor: Mitigating Artifact Drift in Agent Benchmark Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26321/) (2026)
- [What Resolve Rate Hides: Trajectory Structure Diagnostics for Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.06184/) (2026)
- [CodeSpecBench: Benchmarking LLMs for Executable Behavioral Specification Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.12268/) (2026)
- [Beyond the Leaderboard: A Synthesis of Tool-Use, Planning, and Reasoning Failures in Large Language Model Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.05775/) (2026)
- [SciCode-Verified: How Benchmark Defects Underestimated the Scientific-Coding Ability of Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.04975/) (2026)
- [Engineering Reliable Coding Agents: Evaluating and Operating the System Around the Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.13867/) (2026)
- [ExecCritic: Learn to Test, Test to Improve for Coding Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.09133/) (2026)
- [APEX-SWE](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08806/) (2026)
- [SkillForge: Self-Distilling Agents for Project-Specific Issue Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.18933/) (2026)
- [Do Agent Benchmarks Do What They Say? An Executable-Contract Audit of Tool-Using Agent Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.37315/) (2026)
- [Benchmarking Text-to-Python against Text-to-SQL: The Impact of Explicit Logic and Ambiguity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.15728/) (2026)
- [RESCORE: LLM-Driven Simulation Recovery in Control Systems Research Papers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.04324/) (2026)
- [LLM-Oriented Information Retrieval: A Denoising-First Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00505/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has spurred the development of coding agents for real-world code generation. As a widely used benchmark for evaluating the code generation capabilities of these agents, SWE-Bench uses real-world problems based on GitHub issues and their corresponding pull requests. However, the manually written test cases included in these pull requests are often insufficient, allowing generated patches to pass the tests without resolving the underlying issue. To address this challenge, we introduce UTGenerator, an LLM-driven test case generator that automatically analyzes codebases and dependencies to generate test cases for real-world Python projects. Building on UTGenerator, we propose UTBoost, a comprehensive framework for test case augmentation. In our evaluation, we identified 36 task instances with insufficient test cases and uncovered 345 erroneous patches incorrectly labeled as passed in the original SWE Bench. These corrections, impacting 40.9% of SWE-Bench Lite and 24.4% of SWE-Bench Verified leaderboard entries, yield 18 and 11 ranking changes, respectively.