# Hateful Person or Hateful Model? Investigating the Role of Personas in Hate Speech Detection by Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08593 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08593/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 38 of its 65 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 10 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.03442/) (2023)
- [Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.04009/) (2017)
- [Scaling Synthetic Data Creation with 1,000,000,000 Personas](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.20094/) (2024)
- [HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10289/) (2020)
- [Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14576/) (2022)
- [Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05335/) (2023)
- [Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.05719/) (2021)
- [Annotators with Attitudes: How Annotator Beliefs And Identities Bias Toxic Language Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.07997/) (2021)
- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.15606/) (2020)
- [HateBERT: Retraining BERT for Abusive Language Detection in English](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12472/) (2020)
- [Marked Personas: Using Natural Language Prompts to Measure Stereotypes in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18189/) (2023)
- [Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13446/) (2024)
- [Meta-Rewarding Language Models: Self-Improving Alignment with LLM-as-a-Meta-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.19594/) (2024)
- [InCharacter: Evaluating Personality Fidelity in Role-Playing Agents through Psychological Interviews](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17976/) (2023)
- [Quantifying the Persona Effect in LLM Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10811/) (2024)
- [MultiVerS: Improving scientific claim verification with weak supervision and full-document context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.01640/) (2021)
- [Toward a Perspectivist Turn in Ground Truthing for Predictive Computing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.04270/) (2021)
- [Can LLM be a Personalized Judge?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.11657/) (2024)
- [When the Majority is Wrong: Modeling Annotator Disagreement for Subjective Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.06626/) (2023)
- [LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotators](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.19596/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Model Biases in Persona-Steered Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.20253/) (2024)
- [Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.00501/) (2022)
- [Towards Implicit Bias Detection and Mitigation in Multi-Agent LLM Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02584/) (2024)
- [Can Unconfident LLM Annotations Be Used for Confident Conclusions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.15204/) (2024)
- [Personas as a Way to Model Truthfulness in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18168/) (2023)
- [The Ecological Fallacy in Annotation: Modelling Human Label Variation goes beyond Sociodemographics](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.11559/) (2023)
- [Exploring Cross-Cultural Differences in English Hate Speech Annotations: From Dataset Construction to Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.16705/) (2023)
- [CharacterBox: Evaluating the Role-Playing Capabilities of LLMs in Text-Based Virtual Worlds](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05631/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Navigating the digital spectrum: Assessing political bias, stability, and downstream fairness in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.08637/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Hate speech detection is a socially sensitive and inherently subjective task, with judgments often varying based on personal traits. While prior work has examined how socio-demographic factors influence annotation, the impact of personality traits on Large Language Models (LLMs) remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive study on the role of persona prompts in hate speech classification, focusing on MBTI-based traits. A human annotation survey confirms that MBTI dimensions significantly affect labeling behavior. Extending this to LLMs, we prompt four open-source models with MBTI personas and evaluate their outputs across three hate speech datasets. Our analysis uncovers substantial persona-driven variation, including inconsistencies with ground truth, inter-persona disagreement, and logit-level biases. These findings highlight the need to carefully define persona prompts in LLM-based annotation workflows, with implications for fairness and alignment with human values.