# Eliciting Fine-Tuned Transformer Capabilities via Inference-Time Techniques

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.08060 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.08060/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [Attention Is All You Need](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03762/) (2017)
- [LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.09685/) (2021)
- [Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.11401/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameters](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.03314/) (2024)
- [An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02080/) (2021)
- [What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function Classes](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01066/) (2022)
- [Eliciting Latent Predictions from Transformers with the Tuned Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08112/) (2023)
- [Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08271/) (2020)
- [Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.10077/) (2019)
- [On the Turing Completeness of Modern Neural Network Architectures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1901.03429/) (2019)
- [On the Computational Power of Transformers and its Implications in Sequence Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.09286/) (2020)
- [Coresets for Scalable Bayesian Logistic Regression](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.06423/) (2016)
- [Patched RTC: evaluating LLMs for diverse software development tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.16557/) (2024)
- [Patched MOA: optimizing inference for diverse software development tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.18521/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [On Distinguishing Capability Elicitation from Capability Creation in Post-Training: A Free-Energy Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.08368/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models have transformed natural language processing, yet supervised fine-tuning (SFT) remains computationally intensive. This paper formally proves that capabilities acquired through SFT can be approximated by a base transformer model using inference-time techniques, specifically in-context learning (ICL), without altering model parameters, under idealized assumptions including unbounded computational resources and access to the fine-tuning dataset. We extend these results to practical scenarios with finite context lengths and partial dataset access. For text generation tasks with fixed output length l, datasets of size Oleft( fracm Vvarepsilon2 log fracmδ right) or, with bounded context, Oleft( fracl log Vvarepsilon2 log frac1δ right) suffice to approximate fine-tuned behavior across m contexts within error varepsilon, where V is the vocabulary size and δ is the failure probability. For linear classification, datasets of size Oleft( fracdvarepsilon right) or, with fixed context, Oleft( frac1varepsilon2 log frac1δ right) are sufficient, where d is the input dimension. Grounded in the Turing completeness of transformers, these results provide a theoretical foundation for resource-efficient deployment of large language models, with practical techniques like retrieval-augmented generation bridging theory to real-world applications.
