# Supporting Construction Worker Well-Being with a Multi-Agent Conversational AI System

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07997 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07997/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Medical and scientific domain agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 1 of its 15 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 9 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Medical and scientific domain agents](https://mlsanity.com/agents/medical-and-scientific-domain-agents/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Towards Effective GenAI Multi-Agent Collaboration: Design and Evaluation for Enterprise Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05449/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [PV-SQL: Synergizing Database Probing and Rule-based Verification for Text-to-SQL Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17653/) (2026)
- [ISEE: Interactive Semantic Enrichment for Database Fields](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.02604/) (2026)
- [From Pattern Recognizers to Personalized Companions: A Survey of Large Language Models in Mental Health](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.25186/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The construction industry is characterized by both high physical and psychological risks, yet supports of mental health remain limited. While advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), offer promising solutions, their potential in construction remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we developed a conversational multi-agent system that addresses industry-specific challenges through an AI-driven approach integrated with domain knowledge. In parallel, it fulfills construction workers' basic psychological needs by enabling interactions with multiple agents, each has a distinct persona. This approach ensures that workers receive both practical problem-solving support and social engagement, ultimately contributing to their overall well-being. We evaluate its usability and effectiveness through a within-subjects user study with 12 participants. The results show that our system significantly outperforms the single-agent baseline, achieving improvements of 18% in usability, 40% in self-determination, 60% in social presence, and 60% in trust. These findings highlight the promise of LLM-driven AI systems in providing domain-specific support for construction workers.