# Beyond Facts: Evaluating Intent Hallucination in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06539 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06539/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.03172/) (2023)
- [FActScore: Fine-grained Atomic Evaluation of Factual Precision in Long Form Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14251/) (2023)
- [BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04696/) (2020)
- [LIMA: Less Is More for Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11206/) (2023)
- [FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.03754/) (2020)
- [RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.00396/) (2023)
- [Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and Editing for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06855/) (2024)
- [Hallucinated but Factual! Inspecting the Factuality of Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09784/) (2021)
- [FaithEval: Can Your Language Model Stay Faithful to Context, Even If "The Moon is Made of Marshmallows"](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.03727/) (2024)
- [WikiChat: Stopping the Hallucination of Large Language Model Chatbots by Few-Shot Grounding on Wikipedia](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14292/) (2023)
- [A New Benchmark and Reverse Validation Method for Passage-level Hallucination Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06498/) (2023)
- [Constrained Decoding for Neural NLG from Compositional Representations in Task-Oriented Dialogue](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.07220/) (2019)
- [KnowHalu: Hallucination Detection via Multi-Form Knowledge Based Factual Checking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02935/) (2024)
- [A Probabilistic Framework for LLM Hallucination Detection via Belief Tree Propagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.06950/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Why Your Deep Research Agent Fails? On Hallucination Evaluation in Full Research Trajectory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.22984/) (2026)
- [Distributional Semantics Tracing: A Framework for Explaining Hallucinations in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.06107/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

When exposed to complex queries containing multiple conditions, today's large language models (LLMs) tend to produce responses that only partially satisfy the query while neglecting certain conditions. We therefore introduce the concept of Intent Hallucination. In this phenomenon, LLMs either omit (neglecting to address certain parts) or misinterpret (responding to invented query parts) elements of the given query, leading to intent hallucinated generation. To systematically evaluate intent hallucination, we introduce FAITHQA, a novel benchmark for intent hallucination that contains 20,068 problems, covering both query-only and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) setups with varying topics and difficulty. FAITHQA is the first hallucination benchmark that goes beyond factual verification, tailored to identify the fundamental cause of intent hallucination. By evaluating various LLMs on FAITHQA, we find that (1) intent hallucination is a common issue even for state-of-the-art models, and (2) the phenomenon stems from omission or misinterpretation of LLMs. To facilitate future research, we introduce an automatic LLM generation evaluation metric, CONSTRAINT SCORE, for detecting intent hallucination. Human evaluation results demonstrate that CONSTRAINT SCORE is closer to human performance for intent hallucination compared to baselines.