# WISCA: A Consensus-Based Approach to Harmonizing Interpretability in Tabular Datasets

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06455 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.06455/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 6 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.07874/) (2017)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.01365/) (2017)
- [Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.07697/) (2019)
- [Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00069/) (2018)
- [Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.11251/) (2021)
- [From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08164/) (2022)
- [Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.06420/) (2021)
- [Measuring the Quality of Explanations: The System Causability Scale (SCS). Comparing Human and Machine Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.09024/) (2019)
- [FUTURE-AI: International consensus guideline for trustworthy and deployable artificial intelligence in healthcare](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.12325/) (2023)
- [Explainable AI for Interpretable Credit Scoring](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.03749/) (2020)
- [Towards Quantification of Explainability in Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.10104/) (2019)
- [Accurate machine learning force fields via experimental and simulation data fusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.09142/) (2023)
- [Unlocking the Black Box: Analysing the EU Artificial Intelligence Act's Framework for Explainability in AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.14868/) (2025)
- [Trying to Outrun Causality with Machine Learning: Limitations of Model Explainability Techniques for Identifying Predictive Variables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09875/) (2022)
- [SIBILA: A novel interpretable ensemble of general-purpose machine learning models applied to medical contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06234/) (2022)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While predictive accuracy is often prioritized in machine learning (ML) models, interpretability remains essential in scientific and high-stakes domains. However, diverse interpretability algorithms frequently yield conflicting explanations, highlighting the need for consensus to harmonize results. In this study, six ML models were trained on six synthetic datasets with known ground truths, utilizing various model-agnostic interpretability techniques. Consensus explanations were generated using established methods and a novel approach: WISCA (Weighted Scaled Consensus Attributions), which integrates class probability and normalized attributions. WISCA consistently aligned with the most reliable individual method, underscoring the value of robust consensus strategies in improving explanation reliability.