# MMTU: A Massive Multi-Task Table Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05587 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05587/

## Key facts

- Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 58 of its 137 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 58)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.07461/) (2018)
- [On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07258/) (2021)
- [Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05530/) (2024)
- [GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12022/) (2023)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.04615/) (2022)
- [MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01574/) (2024)
- [SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.00537/) (2019)
- [PaLM 2 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10403/) (2023)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Extending Context Window of Large Language Models via Positional Interpolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15595/) (2023)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [Seq2SQL: Generating Structured Queries from Natural Language using Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1709.00103/) (2017)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02164/) (2019)
- [ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14373/) (2020)
- [Deep Entity Matching with Pre-Trained Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.00584/) (2020)
- [TableBench: A Comprehensive and Complex Benchmark for Table Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09174/) (2024)
- [RobustFill: Neural Program Learning under Noisy I/O](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1703.07469/) (2017)
- [HiTab: A Hierarchical Table Dataset for Question Answering and Natural Language Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.06712/) (2021)
- [Table Meets LLM: Can Large Language Models Understand Structured Table Data? A Benchmark and Empirical Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13062/) (2023)
- [SpreadsheetBench: Towards Challenging Real World Spreadsheet Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.14991/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [LLM/Agent-as-Data-Analyst: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23988/) (2025)
- [SpreadsheetBench 2: Evaluating Agents on End-to-End Business Spreadsheet Workflows](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.29955/) (2026)
- [Towards Universal Tabular Embeddings: A Benchmark Across Data Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21696/) (2026)
- [Table Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Tasks, Methods, and Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.09671/) (2025)
- [AraTable: Benchmarking LLMs' Reasoning and Understanding of Arabic Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.18442/) (2025)
- [ReasonTabQA: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Table Question Answering from Real World Industrial Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07280/) (2026)
- [TABVERSE: Benchmarking Cross-Format Table Understanding in LLMs and VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.09578/) (2026)
- [How Do Language Models Understand Tables? A Mechanistic Analysis of Cell Location](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.08548/) (2026)
- [TableVision: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Spatially Grounded Reasoning over Complex Hierarchical Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.03660/) (2026)
- [When Helping Hurts and How to Fix It: Multi-Agent Debate for Data Cleaning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.02866/) (2026)
- [Synthetic Contrastive Reasoning for Multi-Table Q&A](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.05382/) (2026)
- [Auto-Fill: Learning to Predict Missing Values Accurately with Specialist Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.19847/) (2026)
- [TabJoinBench: A Benchmark for Joinable Table Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.00817/) (2026)
- [Structured Composition of Verifiable Atomic Insights for Table-to-Report Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.03525/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Tables and table-based use cases play a crucial role in many important real-world applications, such as spreadsheets, databases, and computational notebooks, which traditionally require expert-level users like data engineers, data analysts, and database administrators to operate. Although LLMs have shown remarkable progress in working with tables (e.g., in spreadsheet and database copilot scenarios), comprehensive benchmarking of such capabilities remains limited. In contrast to an extensive and growing list of NLP benchmarks, evaluations of table-related tasks are scarce, and narrowly focus on tasks like NL-to-SQL and Table-QA, overlooking the broader spectrum of real-world tasks that professional users face. This gap limits our understanding and model progress in this important area. In this work, we introduce MMTU, a large-scale benchmark with over 28K questions across 25 real-world table tasks, designed to comprehensively evaluate models ability to understand, reason, and manipulate real tables at the expert-level. These tasks are drawn from decades' worth of computer science research on tabular data, with a focus on complex table tasks faced by professional users. We show that MMTU require a combination of skills -- including table understanding, reasoning, and coding -- that remain challenging for today's frontier models, where even frontier reasoning models like OpenAI GPT-5 and DeepSeek R1 score only around 69% and 57% respectively, suggesting significant room for improvement. We highlight key findings in our evaluation using MMTU and hope that this benchmark drives further advances in understanding and developing foundation models for structured data processing and analysis. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/MMTU-Benchmark/MMTU and https://huggingface.co/datasets/MMTU-benchmark/MMTU.
