# Personalized Interpretability -- Interactive Alignment of Prototypical Parts Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05533 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05533/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 17 of its 25 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 17 of 17)

- [Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02391/) (2016)
- ["Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.04938/) (2016)
- [Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.03292/) (2018)
- [Concept Bottleneck Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.04612/) (2020)
- [This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.10574/) (2018)
- [Making deep neural networks right for the right scientific reasons by interacting with their explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.05371/) (2020)
- [HIVE: Evaluating the Human Interpretability of Visual Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.03184/) (2021)
- [Interpretable Image Classification with Differentiable Prototypes Assignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02902/) (2021)
- [ProtoPShare: Prototype Sharing for Interpretable Image Classification and Similarity Discovery](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.14340/) (2020)
- [IAIA-BL: A Case-based Interpretable Deep Learning Model for Classification of Mass Lesions in Digital Mammography](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.12308/) (2021)
- [Concept-level Debugging of Part-Prototype Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.15769/) (2022)
- [FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.06248/) (2023)
- [This Looks Like Those: Illuminating Prototypical Concepts Using Multiple Visualizations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.18589/) (2023)
- [Interactive Disentanglement: Learning Concepts by Interacting with their Prototype Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02290/) (2021)
- [LucidPPN: Unambiguous Prototypical Parts Network for User-centric Interpretable Computer Vision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14331/) (2024)
- [Constructing Concept-based Models to Mitigate Spurious Correlations with Minimal Human Effort](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.08947/) (2024)
- [SLIM: Spuriousness Mitigation with Minimal Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.05594/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [SIDE: Sparse Information Disentanglement for Explainable Artificial Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.19321/) (2025)
- [Position: Explainability Research Must Prioritize Foundations over Ad-hoc Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.14123/) (2026)
- [Are Concept Bottleneck Models Effective as Decision-Support Systems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.25581/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Concept-based interpretable neural networks have gained significant attention due to their intuitive and easy-to-understand explanations based on case-based reasoning, such as "this bird looks like those sparrows". However, a major limitation is that these explanations may not always be comprehensible to users due to concept inconsistency, where multiple visual features are inappropriately mixed (e.g., a bird's head and wings treated as a single concept). This inconsistency breaks the alignment between model reasoning and human understanding. Furthermore, users have specific preferences for how concepts should look, yet current approaches provide no mechanism for incorporating their feedback. To address these issues, we introduce YoursProtoP, a novel interactive strategy that enables the personalization of prototypical parts - the visual concepts used by the model - according to user needs. By incorporating user supervision, YoursProtoP adapts and splits concepts used for both prediction and explanation to better match the user's preferences and understanding. Through experiments on both the synthetic FunnyBirds dataset and a real-world scenario using the CUB, CARS, and PETS datasets in a comprehensive user study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of YoursProtoP in achieving concept consistency without compromising the accuracy of the model.