# Micro-Act: Mitigating Knowledge Conflict in LLM-based RAG via Actionable Self-Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05278 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05278/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 18 of its 68 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)
- Retrieval-augmented generation / [RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/rag/rag-robustness-and-adaptive-retrieval/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [A Survey of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.18223/) (2023)
- [WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.09332/) (2021)
- [SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15793/) (2024)
- [GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05229/) (2024)
- [Investigating the Factual Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.11019/) (2023)
- [Tug-of-War Between Knowledge: Exploring and Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Retrieval-Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14409/) (2024)
- [Cutting Off the Head Ends the Conflict: A Mechanism for Interpreting and Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.18154/) (2024)
- [ConflictBank: A Benchmark for Evaluating the Influence of Knowledge Conflicts in LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12076/) (2024)
- [Astute RAG: Overcoming Imperfect Retrieval Augmentation and Knowledge Conflicts for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07176/) (2024)
- [Resolving Knowledge Conflicts in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.00935/) (2023)
- [Middleware for LLMs: Tools Are Instrumental for Language Agents in Complex Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14672/) (2024)
- [IRCAN: Mitigating Knowledge Conflicts in LLM Generation via Identifying and Reweighting Context-Aware Neurons](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.18406/) (2024)
- [Discerning and Resolving Knowledge Conflicts through Adaptive Decoding with Contextual Information-Entropy Constraint](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.11893/) (2024)
- [Intuitive or Dependent? Investigating LLMs' Behavior Style to Conflicting Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17415/) (2023)
- [Tapilot-Crossing: Benchmarking and Evolving LLMs Towards Interactive Data Analysis Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05307/) (2024)
- [SCITAT: A Question Answering Benchmark for Scientific Tables and Text Covering Diverse Reasoning Types](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.11757/) (2024)
- [Exploring Hybrid Question Answering via Program-based Prompting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10812/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [Reliable Post-Retrieval Assembly for Agent Memory: Separating Evidence Extraction from Policy Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.01435/) (2026)
- [Understanding and Mitigating Inference-Time Overreliance Using Agentic Memory](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07311/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems commonly suffer from Knowledge Conflicts, where retrieved external knowledge contradicts the inherent, parametric knowledge of large language models (LLMs). It adversely affects performance on downstream tasks such as question answering (QA). Existing approaches often attempt to mitigate conflicts by directly comparing two knowledge sources in a side-by-side manner, but this can overwhelm LLMs with extraneous or lengthy contexts, ultimately hindering their ability to identify and mitigate inconsistencies. To address this issue, we propose Micro-Act a framework with a hierarchical action space that automatically perceives context complexity and adaptively decomposes each knowledge source into a sequence of fine-grained comparisons. These comparisons are represented as actionable steps, enabling reasoning beyond the superficial context. Through extensive experiments on five benchmark datasets, Micro-Act consistently achieves significant increase in QA accuracy over state-of-the-art baselines across all 5 datasets and 3 conflict types, especially in temporal and semantic types where all baselines fail significantly. More importantly, Micro-Act exhibits robust performance on non-conflict questions simultaneously, highlighting its practical value in real-world RAG applications.