# CIVET: Systematic Evaluation of Understanding in VLMs

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.05146 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.05146/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 23 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 5 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 23 of 23)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1405.0312/) (2014)
- [Segment Anything](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.02643/) (2023)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [Visual Genome: Connecting Language and Vision Using Crowdsourced Dense Image Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.07332/) (2016)
- [Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.00837/) (2016)
- [MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.16502/) (2023)
- [LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02114/) (2021)
- [CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.06890/) (2016)
- [SpatialVLM: Endowing Vision-Language Models with Spatial Reasoning Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12168/) (2024)
- [When and why vision-language models behave like bags-of-words, and what to do about it?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01936/) (2022)
- [Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03162/) (2022)
- [Neural Module Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1511.02799/) (2015)
- [Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07865/) (2024)
- [Teaching CLIP to Count to Ten](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12066/) (2023)
- [TallyQA: Answering Complex Counting Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.12440/) (2018)
- [Waffling around for Performance: Visual Classification with Random Words and Broad Concepts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.07282/) (2023)
- [Understanding Hallucinations in Diffusion Models through Mode Interpolation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09358/) (2024)
- [Synthesize, Diagnose, and Optimize: Towards Fine-Grained Vision-Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00081/) (2023)
- [There is a Time and Place for Reasoning Beyond the Image](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00758/) (2022)
- [Tackling Structural Hallucination in Image Translation with Local Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05980/) (2024)
- [Generate then Select: Open-ended Visual Question Answering Guided by World Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18842/) (2023)
- [If CLIP Could Talk: Understanding Vision-Language Model Representations Through Their Preferred Concept Descriptions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.16442/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [[De|Re]constructing VLMs' Reasoning in Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19555/) (2025)
- [Auto-Comp: An Automated Pipeline for Scalable Compositional Probing of Contrastive Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.02043/) (2026)
- [V-DyKnow: A Dynamic Benchmark for Time-Sensitive Knowledge in Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16581/) (2026)
- [Getting to the Point: Pointing Improves LVLMs at Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21746/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

While Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved competitive performance in various tasks, their comprehension of the underlying structure and semantics of a scene remains understudied. To investigate the understanding of VLMs, we study their capability regarding object properties and relations in a controlled and interpretable manner. To this scope, we introduce CIVET, a novel and extensible framework for systematiC evaluatIon Via controllEd sTimuli. CIVET addresses the lack of standardized systematic evaluation for assessing VLMs' understanding, enabling researchers to test hypotheses with statistical rigor. With CIVET, we evaluate five state-of-the-art VLMs on exhaustive sets of stimuli, free from annotation noise, dataset-specific biases, and uncontrolled scene complexity. Our findings reveal that 1) current VLMs can accurately recognize only a limited set of basic object properties; 2) their performance heavily depends on the position of the object in the scene; 3) they struggle to understand basic relations among objects. Furthermore, a comparative evaluation with human annotators reveals that VLMs still fall short of achieving human-level accuracy.