# Is Perturbation-Based Image Protection Disruptive to Image Editing?

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04394 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04394/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects, one of 14 directions in Diffusion models.
- Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- Diffusion models / [Robustness, privacy and adversarial aspects](https://mlsanity.com/diffusion/robustness-privacy-and-adversarial-aspects/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.04948/) (2018)
- [LAION-5B: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.08402/) (2022)
- [DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.12242/) (2022)
- [CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08718/) (2021)
- [An Image is Worth One Word: Personalizing Text-to-Image Generation using Textual Inversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.01618/) (2022)
- [SDEdit: Guided Image Synthesis and Editing with Stochastic Differential Equations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.01073/) (2021)
- [Multi-Concept Customization of Text-to-Image Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04488/) (2022)
- [Safe Latent Diffusion: Mitigating Inappropriate Degeneration in Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05105/) (2022)
- [Glaze: Protecting Artists from Style Mimicry by Text-to-Image Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04222/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Example Does Good: Preventing Painting Imitation from Diffusion Models via Adversarial Examples](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04578/) (2023)
- [Raising the Cost of Malicious AI-Powered Image Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.06588/) (2023)
- [Anti-DreamBooth: Protecting users from personalized text-to-image synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.15433/) (2023)
- [Mist: Towards Improved Adversarial Examples for Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.12683/) (2023)
- [Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Image and Video Captioning Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12112/) (2023)
- [MetaCloak: Preventing Unauthorized Subject-driven Text-to-image Diffusion-based Synthesis via Meta-learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.13127/) (2023)
- [Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12027/) (2024)
- [Positive-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Vision-and-Language Evaluation and Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07336/) (2024)
- [Exploring Saliency Bias in Manipulation Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.07338/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [StyleProtect: Safeguarding Artistic Identity in Fine-tuned Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.13711/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The remarkable image generation capabilities of state-of-the-art diffusion models, such as Stable Diffusion, can also be misused to spread misinformation and plagiarize copyrighted materials. To mitigate the potential risks associated with image editing, current image protection methods rely on adding imperceptible perturbations to images to obstruct diffusion-based editing. A fully successful protection for an image implies that the output of editing attempts is an undesirable, noisy image which is completely unrelated to the reference image. In our experiments with various perturbation-based image protection methods across multiple domains (natural scene images and artworks) and editing tasks (image-to-image generation and style editing), we discover that such protection does not achieve this goal completely. In most scenarios, diffusion-based editing of protected images generates a desirable output image which adheres precisely to the guidance prompt. Our findings suggest that adding noise to images may paradoxically increase their association with given text prompts during the generation process, leading to unintended consequences such as better resultant edits. Hence, we argue that perturbation-based methods may not provide a sufficient solution for robust image protection against diffusion-based editing.