# Not All Tokens Are Meant to Be Forgotten

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.03142 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.03142/

## Key facts

- Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 45 of its 51 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Machine unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/machine-unlearning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 45)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13971/) (2023)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.01108/) (2019)
- [Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.07805/) (2020)
- [Editing Models with Task Arithmetic](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.04089/) (2022)
- [Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.03817/) (2019)
- [SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.14734/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.00515/) (2024)
- [TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06121/) (2024)
- [The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03218/) (2024)
- [Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05868/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.01504/) (2022)
- [Detecting Pretraining Data from Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.16789/) (2023)
- [Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02238/) (2023)
- [Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03279/) (2021)
- [A Survey of Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2209.02299/) (2022)
- [Large Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.10683/) (2023)
- [MUSE: Machine Unlearning Six-Way Evaluation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.06460/) (2024)
- [Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08787/) (2024)
- [In-Context Unlearning: Language Models as Few Shot Unlearners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.07579/) (2023)
- [Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20150/) (2023)
- [Simplicity Prevails: Rethinking Negative Preference Optimization for LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.07163/) (2024)
- [Eight Methods to Evaluate Robust Unlearning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16835/) (2024)
- [Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10058/) (2024)
- [Continual Learning and Private Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.12817/) (2022)
- [Large Language Model Unlearning via Embedding-Corrupted Prompts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07933/) (2024)
- [Federated Unlearning via Class-Discriminative Pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11794/) (2021)
- [Copyright Violations and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.13771/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 6 of 6)

- [Maximizing Local Entropy Where It Matters: Prefix-Aware Localized LLM Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.03190/) (2026)
- [Attention Smoothing Is All You Need For Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.01285/) (2026)
- [Direct Token Optimization: A Self-contained Approach to Large Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.00125/) (2025)
- [Learning What to Forget: Improving LLM Unlearning via Learned Token-Level Importance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.06320/) (2026)
- [Unlearning What Matters: Token-Level Attribution for Precise Language Model Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00364/) (2026)
- [What to Forget in Unlearning? Forget Set Curation for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.14855/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs), pre-trained on massive text corpora, exhibit remarkable human-level language understanding, reasoning, and decision-making abilities. However, they tend to memorize unwanted information, such as private or copyrighted content, raising significant privacy and legal concerns. Unlearning has emerged as a promising solution, but existing methods face a significant challenge of over-forgetting. This issue arises because they indiscriminately suppress the generation of all the tokens in forget samples, leading to a substantial loss of model utility. To overcome this challenge, we introduce the Targeted Information Forgetting (TIF) framework, which consists of (1) a flexible targeted information identifier designed to differentiate between unwanted words (UW) and general words (GW) in the forget samples, and (2) a novel Targeted Preference Optimization approach that leverages Logit Preference Loss to unlearn unwanted information associated with UW and Preservation Loss to retain general information in GW, effectively improving the unlearning process while mitigating utility degradation. Extensive experiments on the TOFU and MUSE benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed TIF framework enhances unlearning effectiveness while preserving model utility and achieving state-of-the-art results.