# Exploring Explanations Improves the Robustness of In-Context Learning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02378 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02378/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 36 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 36)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.09675/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Invariant Risk Minimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02893/) (2019)
- [A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.05326/) (2015)
- [Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.12837/) (2022)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [Right for the Wrong Reasons: Diagnosing Syntactic Heuristics in Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01007/) (2019)
- [Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1910.14599/) (2019)
- [Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.17548/) (2023)
- [Annotation Artifacts in Natural Language Inference Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02324/) (2018)
- [Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Information](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.09044/) (2021)
- [PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scrambling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01130/) (2019)
- [Environment Inference for Invariant Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07249/) (2020)
- [Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.03683/) (2019)
- [Stress Test Evaluation for Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.00692/) (2018)
- [On the Robustness of ChatGPT: An Adversarial and Out-of-distribution Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12095/) (2023)
- [Are We Modeling the Task or the Annotator? An Investigation of Annotator Bias in Natural Language Understanding Datasets](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.07898/) (2019)
- [What Can We Learn from Collective Human Opinions on Natural Language Inference Data?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03532/) (2020)
- [Compositional Exemplars for In-context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05698/) (2023)
- [Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06800/) (2022)
- [End-to-End Bias Mitigation by Modelling Biases in Corpora](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.06321/) (2019)
- [Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.12254/) (2023)
- [Unlearn Dataset Bias in Natural Language Inference by Fitting the Residual](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.10763/) (2019)
- [Large Language Models Can be Lazy Learners: Analyze Shortcuts in In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.17256/) (2023)
- [Coverage-based Example Selection for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14907/) (2023)
- [Explore Spurious Correlations at the Concept Level in Language Models for Text Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.08648/) (2023)
- [Examining the robustness of LLM evaluation to the distributional assumptions of benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16966/) (2024)
- [Not another Negation Benchmark: The NaN-NLI Test Suite for Sub-clausal Negation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2210.03256/) (2022)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [CoDA: Towards Effective Cross-domain Knowledge Transfer via CoT-guided Domain Adaptation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.19488/) (2026)
- [Cross-Model Humor Preference Modeling with Cards Against Humanity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.07481/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a successful paradigm for leveraging large language models (LLMs). However, it often struggles to generalize beyond the distribution of the provided demonstrations. A recent advancement in enhancing robustness is ICL with explanations (X-ICL), which improves prediction reliability by guiding LLMs to understand and articulate the reasoning behind correct labels. Building on this approach, we introduce an advanced framework that extends X-ICL by systematically exploring explanations for all possible labels (X2-ICL), thereby enabling more comprehensive and robust decision-making. Experimental results on multiple natural language understanding datasets validate the effectiveness of X2-ICL, demonstrating significantly improved robustness to out-of-distribution data compared to the existing ICL approaches.