# SALF-MOS: Speaker Agnostic Latent Features Downsampled for MOS Prediction

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.02082 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.02082/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 22 of 22)

- [U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1505.04597/) (2015)
- [wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.11477/) (2020)
- [HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Units](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.07447/) (2021)
- [WavLM: Large-Scale Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Full Stack Speech Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13900/) (2021)
- [UTMOS: UTokyo-SaruLab System for VoiceMOS Challenge 2022](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.02152/) (2022)
- [TERA: Self-Supervised Learning of Transformer Encoder Representation for Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06028/) (2020)
- [MOSNet: Deep Learning based Objective Assessment for Voice Conversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.08352/) (2019)
- [The Voice Conversion Challenge 2018: Promoting Development of Parallel and Nonparallel Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.04262/) (2018)
- [The VoiceMOS Challenge 2022](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11389/) (2022)
- [Quality-Net: An End-to-End Non-intrusive Speech Quality Assessment Model based on BLSTM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.05344/) (2018)
- [MBNet: MOS Prediction for Synthesized Speech with Mean-Bias Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00110/) (2021)
- [Deep Learning-based Non-Intrusive Multi-Objective Speech Assessment Model with Cross-Domain Features](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02363/) (2021)
- [LDNet: Unified Listener Dependent Modeling in MOS Prediction for Synthetic Speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09103/) (2021)
- [AutoMOS: Learning a non-intrusive assessor of naturalness-of-speech](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1611.09207/) (2016)
- [SOMOS: The Samsung Open MOS Dataset for the Evaluation of Neural Text-to-Speech Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03040/) (2022)
- [Speech Quality Assessment through MOS using Non-Matching References](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.12285/) (2022)
- [Fusion of Self-supervised Learned Models for MOS Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.04855/) (2022)
- [InQSS: a speech intelligibility and quality assessment model using a multi-task learning network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02585/) (2021)
- [DDOS: A MOS Prediction Framework utilizing Domain Adaptive Pre-training and Distribution of Opinion Scores](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.03219/) (2022)
- [MOSPC: MOS Prediction Based on Pairwise Comparison](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.10493/) (2023)
- [LE-SSL-MOS: Self-Supervised Learning MOS Prediction with Listener Enhancement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.10656/) (2023)
- [Evaluation of Speech Representations for MOS prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.09979/) (2023)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Speech quality assessment is a critical process in selecting text-to-speech synthesis (TTS) or voice conversion models. Evaluation of voice synthesis can be done using objective metrics or subjective metrics. Although there are many objective metrics like the Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ), Perceptual Objective Listening Quality Assessment (POLQA) or Short-Time Objective Intelligibility (STOI) but none of them is feasible in selecting the best model. On the other hand subjective metric like Mean Opinion Score is highly reliable but it requires a lot of manual efforts and are time-consuming. To counter the issues in MOS Evaluation, we have developed a novel model, Speaker Agnostic Latent Features (SALF)-Mean Opinion Score (MOS) which is a small-sized, end-to-end, highly generalized and scalable model for predicting MOS score on a scale of 5. We use the sequences of convolutions and stack them to get the latent features of the audio samples to get the best state-of-the-art results based on mean squared error (MSE), Linear Concordance Correlation coefficient (LCC), Spearman Rank Correlation Coefficient (SRCC) and Kendall Rank Correlation Coefficient (KTAU).