# Fodor and Pylyshyn's Legacy: Still No Human-like Systematic Compositionality in Neural Networks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01820 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01820/

## Key facts

- Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.10601/) (2023)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.12712/) (2023)
- [Learning to summarize from human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.01325/) (2020)
- [Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07682/) (2022)
- [Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.00593/) (2022)
- [Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic Interpretability](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14997/) (2023)
- [Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.15004/) (2023)
- [Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18654/) (2023)
- [Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.02098/) (2022)
- [How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.00586/) (2023)
- [Embodied Intelligence via Learning and Evolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.02202/) (2021)
- [DreamCoder: Growing generalizable, interpretable knowledge with wake-sleep Bayesian program learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.08381/) (2020)
- [Causal Parrots: Large Language Models May Talk Causality But Are Not Causal](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.13067/) (2023)
- [Alice in Wonderland: Simple Tasks Showing Complete Reasoning Breakdown in State-Of-the-Art Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.02061/) (2024)
- [Symbols as a Lingua Franca for Bridging Human-AI Chasm for Explainable and Advisable AI Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09904/) (2021)
- [Emergence of Hidden Capabilities: Exploring Learning Dynamics in Concept Space](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.19370/) (2024)
- [Passive learning of active causal strategies in agents and language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16183/) (2023)
- [The Pitfalls of Memorization: When Memorization Hurts Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.07684/) (2024)
- [Pix2Code: Learning to Compose Neural Visual Concepts as Programs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08280/) (2024)
- [Learning by Self-Explaining](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.08395/) (2023)
- [SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.00854/) (2024)
- [Bongard in Wonderland: Visual Puzzles that Still Make AI Go Mad?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.19546/) (2024)
- [A Survey on Compositional Learning of AI Models: Theoretical and Experimental Practices](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.08787/) (2024)
- [Transformer-Based Models Are Not Yet Perfect At Learning to Emulate Structural Recursion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.12947/) (2024)
- [Neural Concept Binder](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.09949/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 3 of 3)

- [ActivationReasoning: Logical Reasoning in Latent Activation Spaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.18184/) (2025)
- [Grounding vs. Compositionality: On the Non-Complementarity of Reasoning in Neuro-Symbolic Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.26521/) (2026)
- [An Investigation of the NeurIPS and ICML 2025 Position Tracks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.16894/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Strong meta-learning capabilities for systematic compositionality are emerging as an important skill for navigating the complex and changing tasks of today's world. However, in presenting models for robust adaptation to novel environments, it is important to refrain from making unsupported claims about the performance of meta-learning systems that ultimately do not stand up to scrutiny. While Fodor and Pylyshyn famously posited that neural networks inherently lack this capacity as they are unable to model compositional representations or structure-sensitive operations, and thus are not a viable model of the human mind, Lake and Baroni recently presented meta-learning as a pathway to compositionality. In this position paper, we critically revisit this claim and highlight limitations in the proposed meta-learning framework for compositionality. Our analysis shows that modern neural meta-learning systems can only perform such tasks, if at all, under a very narrow and restricted definition of a meta-learning setup. We therefore claim that `Fodor and Pylyshyn's legacy' persists, and to date, there is no human-like systematic compositionality learned in neural networks.