# DRAUN: An Algorithm-Agnostic Data Reconstruction Attack on Federated Unlearning Systems

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.01777 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.01777/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security.
- Builds on 43 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 2 Jun 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM safety and security / [Federated unlearning and poisoning](https://mlsanity.com/safety/federated-unlearning-and-poisoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 43)

- [Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1512.03385/) (2015)
- [The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.03924/) (2018)
- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Generative Adversarial Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.00667/) (2022)
- [Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1806.07572/) (2018)
- [Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08935/) (2019)
- [LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.01097/) (2018)
- [Inverting Gradients -- How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.14053/) (2020)
- [Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1712.01887/) (2017)
- [iDLG: Improved Deep Leakage from Gradients](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.02610/) (2020)
- [Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.07464/) (2017)
- [See through Gradients: Image Batch Recovery via GradInversion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.07586/) (2021)
- [Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.05890/) (2019)
- [Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11571/) (2021)
- [Beyond Inferring Class Representatives: User-Level Privacy Leakage From Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1812.00535/) (2018)
- [Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.00059/) (2021)
- [Directional convergence and alignment in deep learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2006.06657/) (2020)
- [Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversaries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.04845/) (2022)
- [Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.07758/) (2022)
- [When the Curious Abandon Honesty: Federated Learning Is Not Private](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.02918/) (2021)
- [Updates-Leak: Data Set Inference and Reconstruction Attacks in Online Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.01067/) (2019)
- [Robbing the Fed: Directly Obtaining Private Data in Federated Learning with Modified Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.13057/) (2021)
- [Gradient Inversion with Generative Image Prior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14962/) (2021)
- [R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on Privacy](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.07733/) (2020)
- [Federated Unlearning: How to Efficiently Erase a Client in FL?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.05521/) (2022)
- [Provable Defense against Privacy Leakage in Federated Learning from Representation Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06043/) (2020)
- [Fishing for User Data in Large-Batch Federated Learning via Gradient Magnification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.00580/) (2022)
- [A Survey on Federated Unlearning: Challenges, Methods, and Future Directions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.20448/) (2023)
- [Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.03233/) (2024)
- [Towards General Deep Leakage in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.09074/) (2021)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Federated Unlearning (FU) enables clients to remove the influence of specific data from a collaboratively trained shared global model, addressing regulatory requirements such as GDPR and CCPA. However, this unlearning process introduces a new privacy risk: A malicious server may exploit unlearning updates to reconstruct the data requested for removal, a form of Data Reconstruction Attack (DRA). While DRAs for machine unlearning have been studied extensively in centralized Machine Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS) settings, their applicability to FU remains unclear due to the decentralized, client-driven nature of FU. This work presents DRAUN, the first attack framework to reconstruct unlearned data in FU systems. DRAUN targets optimization-based unlearning methods, which are widely adopted for their efficiency. We theoretically demonstrate why existing DRAs targeting machine unlearning in MLaaS fail in FU and show how DRAUN overcomes these limitations. We validate our approach through extensive experiments on four datasets and four model architectures, evaluating its performance against five popular unlearning methods, effectively demonstrating that state-of-the-art FU methods remain vulnerable to DRAs.