# Off-Policy Evaluation of Ranking Policies via Embedding-Space User Behavior Modeling

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00446 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00446/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 21 of its 35 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 21 of 21)

- [Doubly Robust Policy Evaluation and Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1503.02834/) (2015)
- [Off-policy evaluation for slate recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1605.04812/) (2016)
- [Offline A/B testing for Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07030/) (2018)
- [Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkage](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.09623/) (2019)
- [Open Bandit Dataset and Pipeline: Towards Realistic and Reproducible Off-Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2008.07146/) (2020)
- [Policy Learning for Fairness in Ranking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.04056/) (2019)
- [Policy Evaluation and Optimization with Continuous Treatments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.06037/) (2018)
- [Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Embeddings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.06317/) (2022)
- [Adaptive Estimator Selection for Off-Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2002.07729/) (2020)
- [Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.00855/) (2021)
- [Counterfactual Evaluation of Slate Recommendations with Sequential Reward Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.12986/) (2020)
- [Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Conjunct Effect Modeling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.08062/) (2023)
- [Offline Evaluation of Ranking Policies with Click Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.10488/) (2018)
- [Doubly Robust Off-Policy Evaluation for Ranking Policies under the Cascade Behavior Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.01562/) (2022)
- [Policy-Adaptive Estimator Selection for Off-Policy Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.13904/) (2022)
- [Off-Policy Evaluation of Slate Bandit Policies via Optimizing Abstraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.02171/) (2024)
- [Off-Policy Evaluation of Ranking Policies under Diverse User Behavior](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.15098/) (2023)
- [Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Policy Convolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.15433/) (2023)
- [POTEC: Off-Policy Learning for Large Action Spaces via Two-Stage Policy Decomposition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.06151/) (2024)
- [Long-term Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15691/) (2024)
- [Effective Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning in Contextual Combinatorial Bandits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.11202/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Off-policy evaluation (OPE) in ranking settings with large ranking action spaces, which stems from an increase in both the number of unique actions and length of the ranking, is essential for assessing new recommender policies using only logged bandit data from previous versions. To address the high variance issues associated with existing estimators, we introduce two new assumptions: no direct effect on rankings and user behavior model on ranking embedding spaces. We then propose the generalized marginalized inverse propensity score (GMIPS) estimator with statistically desirable properties compared to existing ones. Finally, we demonstrate that the GMIPS achieves the lowest MSE. Notably, among GMIPS variants, the marginalized reward interaction IPS (MRIPS) incorporates a doubly marginalized importance weight based on a cascade behavior assumption on ranking embeddings. MRIPS effectively balances the trade-off between bias and variance, even as the ranking action spaces increase and the above assumptions may not hold, as evidenced by our experiments.