# SHARE: An SLM-based Hierarchical Action CorREction Assistant for Text-to-SQL

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.00391 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00391/

## Key facts

- Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 38 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 31 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.08361/) (2020)
- [Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.11171/) (2022)
- [LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.13372/) (2024)
- [Mind2Web: Towards a Generalist Agent for the Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06070/) (2023)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.01798/) (2023)
- [Teaching Large Language Models to Self-Debug](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.05128/) (2023)
- [CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11738/) (2023)
- [Can LLM Already Serve as A Database Interface? A BIg Bench for Large-Scale Database Grounded Text-to-SQLs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.03111/) (2023)
- [Pre-trained Models for Natural Language Processing: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2003.08271/) (2020)
- [DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11015/) (2023)
- [Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15363/) (2023)
- [CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Tests](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.10397/) (2022)
- [Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.10719/) (2024)
- [CHESS: Contextual Harnessing for Efficient SQL Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.16755/) (2024)
- [MAC-SQL: A Multi-Agent Collaborative Framework for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11242/) (2023)
- [CHASE-SQL: Multi-Path Reasoning and Preference Optimized Candidate Selection in Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.01943/) (2024)
- [Neural Path Hunter: Reducing Hallucination in Dialogue Systems via Path Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08455/) (2021)
- [MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07467/) (2024)
- [Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting in Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06002/) (2020)
- [Graphix-T5: Mixing Pre-Trained Transformers with Graph-Aware Layers for Text-to-SQL Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07507/) (2023)
- [Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05157/) (2021)
- [ChartCoder: Advancing Multimodal Large Language Model for Chart-to-Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06598/) (2025)
- [Before Generation, Align it! A Novel and Effective Strategy for Mitigating Hallucinations in Text-to-SQL Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.15307/) (2024)
- [Middleware for LLMs: Tools Are Instrumental for Language Agents in Complex Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14672/) (2024)
- [MAGIC: Generating Self-Correction Guideline for In-Context Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12692/) (2024)
- [Decomposition for Enhancing Attention: Improving LLM-based Text-to-SQL through Workflow Paradigm](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.10671/) (2024)
- [A Survey of Table Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.08259/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 16 of 16)

- [BIRD-INTERACT: Re-imagining Text-to-SQL Evaluation for Large Language Models via Lens of Dynamic Interactions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.05318/) (2025)
- [SWE-SQL: Illuminating LLM Pathways to Solve User SQL Issues in Real-World Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.18951/) (2025)
- [MARS-SQL: A multi-agent reinforcement learning framework for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01008/) (2025)
- [Text-to-SQL as Dual-State Reasoning: Integrating Adaptive Context and Progressive Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.21402/) (2025)
- [Memo-SQL: Structured Decomposition and Experience-Driven Self-Correction for Training-Free NL2SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.10011/) (2026)
- [ErrorLLM: Modeling SQL Errors for Text-to-SQL Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03742/) (2026)
- [Human-Level Text-to-SQL via Reinforcement Learning on Verified Data, Without Pipeline Engineering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.20004/) (2026)
- [EGREFINE: An Execution-Grounded Optimization Framework for Text-to-SQL Schema Refinement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00628/) (2026)
- [SemanticAgent: A Semantics-Aware Framework for Text-to-SQL Data Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.21414/) (2026)
- [LEAF-SQL: Level-wise Exploration with Adaptive Fine-graining for Text-to-SQL Skeleton Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09295/) (2026)
- [CAPER: Clause-Aligned Process Supervision for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.03327/) (2026)
- [Beyond Static Rules: Automated Discovery of Latent Vulnerabilities in Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.03833/) (2026)
- [Are These Modules Worth Their Cost? A Paradigm-Level Accuracy-Cost Analysis of In-context Learning Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28432/) (2026)
- [BIRD-History: A Benchmark for History-Driven Text-to-SQL with Fine-Grained Knowledge Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29345/) (2026)
- [COAL-SQL: Coverage-Guided Augmentation and Failure-Driven Learning for Text-to-SQL Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.20842/) (2026)
- [Why, Where, How: Taxonomy-guided Error Grounding for Code Repair in NL2SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.05060/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Current self-correction approaches in text-to-SQL face two critical limitations: 1) Conventional self-correction methods rely on recursive self-calls of LLMs, resulting in multiplicative computational overhead, and 2) LLMs struggle to implement effective error detection and correction for declarative SQL queries, as they fail to demonstrate the underlying reasoning path. In this work, we propose SHARE, an SLM-based Hierarchical Action corREction assistant that enables LLMs to perform more precise error localization and efficient correction. SHARE orchestrates three specialized Small Language Models (SLMs) in a sequential pipeline, where it first transforms declarative SQL queries into stepwise action trajectories that reveal underlying reasoning, followed by a two-phase granular refinement. We further propose a novel hierarchical self-evolution strategy for data-efficient training. Experimental results demonstrate that SHARE effectively enhances self-correction capabilities while proving robust across various LLMs. Furthermore, our comprehensive analysis shows that SHARE maintains strong performance even in low-resource training settings, which is particularly valuable for text-to-SQL applications with data privacy constraints.