# Scalable, Symbiotic, AI and Non-AI Agent Based Parallel Discrete Event Simulations

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23846 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.23846/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 24 of its 72 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 24 of 24)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasoners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.11916/) (2022)
- [Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.11366/) (2023)
- [Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.01652/) (2021)
- [Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layer](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1701.06538/) (2017)
- [Mixtral of Experts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.04088/) (2024)
- [On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder-Decoder Approaches](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1409.1259/) (2014)
- [Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.12588/) (2022)
- [DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06066/) (2024)
- [Reasoning with Language Model is Planning with World Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.14992/) (2023)
- [Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.09368/) (2022)
- [OpenMoE: An Early Effort on Open Mixture-of-Experts Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.01739/) (2024)
- [A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05587/) (2018)
- [Solving Challenging Math Word Problems Using GPT-4 Code Interpreter with Code-based Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.07921/) (2023)
- [Mutual Reasoning Makes Smaller LLMs Stronger Problem-Solvers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.06195/) (2024)
- [Everything of Thoughts: Defying the Law of Penrose Triangle for Thought Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.04254/) (2023)
- [Learning to Route Among Specialized Experts for Zero-Shot Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.05859/) (2024)
- [Learning to Decode Collaboratively with Multiple Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.03870/) (2024)
- [Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00024/) (2023)
- [DRDT: Dynamic Reflection with Divergent Thinking for LLM-based Sequential Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11336/) (2023)
- [End-to-end Speech Recognition with Word-based RNN Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1808.02608/) (2018)
- [GPT-Based Models Meet Simulation: How to Efficiently Use Large-Scale Pre-Trained Language Models Across Simulation Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13679/) (2023)
- [Smart Agent-Based Modeling: On the Use of Large Language Models in Computer Simulations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06330/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Specification-Driven Generation and Evaluation of Discrete-Event World Models via the DEVS Formalism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.03784/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

To fully leverage the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in a trustworthy manner, it is desirable to couple multiple AI and non-AI systems together seamlessly for constraining and ensuring correctness of the output. This paper introduces a novel parallel discrete event simulation (PDES) based methodology to combine multiple AI and non-AI agents in a causal, rule-based way. Our approach tightly integrates the concept of passage of time, with each agent considered as an entity in the PDES framework and responding to prior requests from other agents. Such coupling mechanism enables the agents to work in a co-operative environment towards a common goal while many tasks run in parallel throughout the simulation. It further enables setting up boundaries to the outputs of the AI agents by applying necessary dynamic constraints using non-AI agents while allowing for scalability through deployment of hundreds of such agents in a larger compute cluster. Distributing smaller AI agents can enable extremely scalable simulations in the future, addressing local memory bottlenecks for model parameter storage. Within a PDES involving both AI and non-AI agents, we break down the problem at hand into structured steps, when necessary, providing a set of multiple choices to the AI agents, and then progressively solve these steps towards a final goal. At each step, the non-AI agents act as unbiased auditors, verifying each action by the AI agents so that certain rules of engagement are followed. We evaluate our approach by solving four problems from four different domains and comparing the results with those from AI models alone. Our results show greater accuracy in solving problems from various domains where the AI models struggle to solve the problems solely by themselves. Results show that overall accuracy of our approach is 68% where as the accuracy of vanilla models is less than 23%.