# On the Reliability and Stability of Selective Methods in Malware Classification Tasks

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22843 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22843/

## Key facts

- Cited by 1 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 15 of its 49 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 15 of 15)

- [On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.04599/) (2017)
- [Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1705.08500/) (2017)
- [Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14486/) (2022)
- [Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.08206/) (2018)
- [Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.01458/) (2020)
- [Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.11277/) (2021)
- [TESSERACT: Eliminating Experimental Bias in Malware Classification across Space and Time](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.07838/) (2018)
- [Transcending Transcend: Revisiting Malware Classification in the Presence of Concept Drift](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03856/) (2020)
- [Overcoming Common Flaws in the Evaluation of Selective Classification Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.01032/) (2024)
- [What Can We Learn From The Selective Prediction And Uncertainty Estimation Performance Of 523 Imagenet Classifiers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.11874/) (2023)
- [Confidence Estimation via Auxiliary Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.06508/) (2020)
- [MaMaDroid: Detecting Android Malware by Building Markov Chains of Behavioral Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1612.04433/) (2016)
- [eXpose: A Character-Level Convolutional Neural Network with Embeddings For Detecting Malicious URLs, File Paths and Registry Keys](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1702.08568/) (2017)
- [Context-aware, Adaptive and Scalable Android Malware Detection through Online Learning (extended version)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.00947/) (2017)
- [TIF: Learning Temporal Invariance in Android Malware Detectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.05098/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 1 of 1)

- [Malaika: Understanding Malware through Tri-Grounded Agentic Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.09179/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The performance figures of modern drift-adaptive malware classifiers appear promising, but does this translate to genuine operational reliability? The standard evaluation paradigm primarily focuses on baseline performance metrics, neglecting confidence-error alignment and operational stability. While prior works established the importance of temporal evaluation and introduced selective classification in malware classification tasks, we take a complementary direction by investigating whether malware classifiers maintain reliable and stable confidence estimates under distribution shifts and exploring the tensions between scientific advancement and practical impacts when they do not. We propose Aurora, a framework to evaluate malware classifiers based on their confidence quality and operational resilience. Aurora subjects the confidence profile of a given model to verification to assess the reliability of its estimates. Unreliable confidence estimates erode operational trust, waste valuable annotation budgets on non-informative samples for active learning, and leave error-prone instances undetected in selective classification. Aurora is further complemented by a set of metrics designed to go beyond point-in-time performance, striving towards a more holistic assessment of operational stability throughout temporal evaluation periods. The fragility we observe in SOTA frameworks across datasets of varying drift severity suggests it may be time to revisit the underlying assumptions.
