# Sherlock: Self-Correcting Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22651 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22651/

## Key facts

- Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 42 of its 59 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Multimodal reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/multimodal-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/vlm-benchmarks-and-visual-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 42)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contexts](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.02255/) (2023)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.02490/) (2023)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.20330/) (2024)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [LLaVA-CoT: Let Vision Language Models Reason Step-by-Step](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.10440/) (2024)
- [Training Language Models to Self-Correct via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12917/) (2024)
- [R1-Onevision: Advancing Generalized Multimodal Reasoning through Cross-Modal Formalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.10615/) (2025)
- [VL-Rethinker: Incentivizing Self-Reflection of Vision-Language Models with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.08837/) (2025)
- [MM-Eureka: Exploring the Frontiers of Multimodal Reasoning with Rule-based Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07365/) (2025)
- [R1-VL: Learning to Reason with Multimodal Large Language Models via Step-wise Group Relative Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.12937/) (2025)
- [LMM-R1: Empowering 3B LMMs with Strong Reasoning Abilities Through Two-Stage Rule-Based RL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.07536/) (2025)
- [Nash Learning from Human Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.00886/) (2023)
- [Mulberry: Empowering MLLM with o1-like Reasoning and Reflection via Collective Monte Carlo Tree Search](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.18319/) (2024)
- [Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16837/) (2024)
- [LLM Critics Help Catch LLM Bugs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.00215/) (2024)
- [LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.06186/) (2025)
- [SoTA with Less: MCTS-Guided Sample Selection for Data-Efficient Visual Reasoning Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07934/) (2025)
- [Improve Vision Language Model Chain-of-thought Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16198/) (2024)
- [LLaVA-Critic: Learning to Evaluate Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02712/) (2024)
- [MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05237/) (2024)
- [Insight-V: Exploring Long-Chain Visual Reasoning with Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.14432/) (2024)
- [Reason-RFT: Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Visual Reasoning of Vision Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20752/) (2025)
- [The Hidden Risks of Large Reasoning Models: A Safety Assessment of R1](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.12659/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 13 of 13)

- [Agent0-VL: Exploring Self-Evolving Agent for Tool-Integrated Vision-Language Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.19900/) (2025)
- [Generative Universal Verifier as Multimodal Meta-Reasoner](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.13804/) (2025)
- [Does On-Policy Distillation Really Distill? From Noisy Teacher to Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.31046/) (2026)
- [Towards Explainable Industrial Anomaly Detection via Knowledge-Guided Latent Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.09850/) (2026)
- [Toward More Reliable Artificial Intelligence: Reducing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.07564/) (2025)
- [Benchmarking and Evolving Reason-Reflect-Rectify for Reflective Visual Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.19639/) (2026)
- [SVR-R1: Bootstrapping Multi-modal Reasoning with Self-verification in Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.10966/) (2026)
- [Counteracting Matthew Effect in Self-Improvement of LVLMs through Head-Tail Re-balancing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.26474/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning: From Perception, Alignment to Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.08291/) (2026)
- [A Nash Equilibrium Framework For Training-Free Multimodal Step Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.20033/) (2026)
- [VERDICT: Training-Free Step-Wise Verification of Multimodal Reasoning via Disagreement-Aware Consensus](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.10665/) (2026)
- [When to Rethink: Learning Multi-Perspective Self-Verification for Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.07018/) (2026)
- [The Value of Being Wrong: Self-Mined Visual In-Context Learning from Errors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.16977/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have shown promising performance on complex multimodal tasks. However, they still face significant challenges: they are highly sensitive to reasoning errors, require large volumes of annotated data or accurate verifiers, and struggle to generalize beyond specific domains. To address these limitations, we explore self-correction as a strategy to enhance reasoning VLMs. We first conduct an in-depth analysis of reasoning VLMs' self-correction abilities and identify key gaps. Based on our findings, we introduce Sherlock, a self-correction and self-improvement training framework. Sherlock introduces a trajectory-level self-correction objective, a preference data construction method based on visual perturbation, and a dynamic β for preference tuning. Once the model acquires self-correction capabilities using only 20k randomly sampled annotated data, it continues to self-improve without external supervision. Built on the Llama3.2-Vision-11B model, Sherlock achieves remarkable results across eight benchmarks, reaching an average accuracy of 64.1 with direct generation and 65.4 after self-correction. It outperforms LLaVA-CoT (63.2), Mulberry (63.9), and LlamaV-o1 (63.4) while using less than 20% of the annotated data.