# Evaluating Supervised Learning Models for Fraud Detection: A Comparative Study of Classical and Deep Architectures on Imbalanced Transaction Data

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22521 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.22521/

## Key facts

- Cited by 20 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 11 of its 26 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 28 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 11 of 11)

- [FutureSightDrive: Thinking Visually with Spatio-Temporal CoT for Autonomous Driving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.17685/) (2025)
- [Enhancing Code LLMs with Reinforcement Learning in Code Generation: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.20367/) (2024)
- [FineCIR: Explicit Parsing of Fine-Grained Modification Semantics for Composed Image Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.21309/) (2025)
- [Post-Training Attribute Unlearning in Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.06737/) (2024)
- [Predicting 30-Day Hospital Readmission in Medicare Patients: Insights from an LSTM Deep Learning Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.17545/) (2024)
- [Fraud Dataset Benchmark and Applications](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.14417/) (2022)
- [NeRF-Based defect detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.00270/) (2025)
- [Optimization and Application of Cloud-based Deep Learning Architecture for Multi-Source Data Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.12642/) (2024)
- [Performance Review on LLM for solving leetcode problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.15770/) (2025)
- [Tutorial on Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Mental Illness Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04342/) (2025)
- [Efficient or Powerful? Trade-offs Between Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Mental Illness Detection on Social Media](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01082/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [OFFSET: Segmentation-based Focus Shift Revision for Composed Image Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.05631/) (2025)
- [Self-Evolving Multi-Agent Systems via Textual Backpropagation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.09046/) (2025)
- [Gated Multimodal Graph Learning for Personalized Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.00107/) (2025)
- [A Narrative Review on Large AI Models in Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.07236/) (2025)
- [Robust Anomaly Detection in Network Traffic: Evaluating Machine Learning Models on CICIDS2017](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.19877/) (2025)
- [Language-Driven Coordination and Learning in Multi-Agent Simulation Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.04251/) (2025)
- [Analysis of Anonymous User Interaction Relationships and Prediction of Advertising Feedback Based on Graph Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13787/) (2025)
- [Modality-Aware Infrared and Visible Image Fusion with Target-Aware Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.11476/) (2025)
- [Fatigue-Aware Adaptive Interfaces for Wearable Devices Using Deep Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13203/) (2025)
- [Enhanced Pre-training of Graph Neural Networks for Million-Scale Heterogeneous Graphs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12401/) (2025)
- [LEGO: A Lightweight and Efficient Multiple-Attribute Unlearning Framework for Recommender Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.20327/) (2025)
- [LPCAN: Lightweight Pyramid Cross-Attention Network for Rail Surface Defect Detection Using RGB-D Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09118/) (2026)
- [Knowledge-Embedded and Hypernetwork-Guided Few-Shot Substation Meter Defect Image Generation Method](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09238/) (2026)
- [MA-LipNet: Multi-Dimensional Attention Networks for Robust Lipreading](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.20881/) (2026)
- [The Diffusion Duet: Harmonizing Dual Channels with Wavelet Suppression for Image Separation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.13361/) (2026)
- [Detecting Deepfakes with Multivariate Soft Blending and CLIP-based Image-Text Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.15903/) (2026)
- [Efficient Image Super-Resolution with Multi-Scale Spatial Adaptive Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00118/) (2026)
- [A Deformable Attention-Based Detection Transformer with Cross-Scale Feature Fusion for Industrial Coil Spring Inspection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13429/) (2026)
- [Multi-View Deformable Convolution Meets Visual Mamba for Coronary Artery Segmentation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.21829/) (2026)
- [Temporal Graph Prototype-conditioned Conformal Prediction for Fraud Detection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.15768/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Fraud detection remains a critical task in high-stakes domains such as finance and e-commerce, where undetected fraudulent transactions can lead to significant economic losses. In this study, we systematically compare the performance of four supervised learning models - Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and a Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) network - on a large-scale, highly imbalanced online transaction dataset. While ensemble methods such as Random Forest and LightGBM demonstrated superior performance in both overall and class-specific metrics, Logistic Regression offered a reliable and interpretable baseline. The GRU model showed strong recall for the minority fraud class, though at the cost of precision, highlighting a trade-off relevant for real-world deployment. Our evaluation emphasizes not only weighted averages but also per-class precision, recall, and F1-scores, providing a nuanced view of each model's effectiveness in detecting rare but consequential fraudulent activity. The findings underscore the importance of choosing models based on the specific risk tolerance and operational needs of fraud detection systems.
