# Addressing Data Quality Decompensation in Federated Learning via Dynamic Client Selection

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21219 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.21219/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 19 of its 50 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 19 of 19)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.07747/) (2017)
- [On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.02189/) (2019)
- [Towards Federated Learning at Scale: System Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.01046/) (2019)
- [Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1904.02868/) (2019)
- [Federated Optimization: Distributed Machine Learning for On-Device Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1610.02527/) (2016)
- [Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11815/) (2019)
- [Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.08333/) (2018)
- [Clustered Sampling: Low-Variance and Improved Representativity for Clients Selection in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.05883/) (2021)
- [Decentralized Federated Learning: A Survey and Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.01603/) (2023)
- [Survey on Federated Learning Threats: concepts, taxonomy on attacks and defences, experimental study and challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.08135/) (2022)
- [Federated Learning for Edge Networks: Resource Optimization and Incentive Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05642/) (2019)
- [GTG-Shapley: Efficient and Accurate Participant Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.02053/) (2021)
- [Data Poisoning Attacks on Federated Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.10020/) (2020)
- [Motivating Workers in Federated Learning: A Stackelberg Game Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1908.03092/) (2019)
- [Toward an Automated Auction Framework for Wireless Federated Learning Services Market](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1912.06370/) (2019)
- [Evaluating Federated Learning for Intrusion Detection in Internet of Things: Review and Challenges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.00974/) (2021)
- [Incentive Mechanism Design for Joint Resource Allocation in Blockchain-based Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2202.10938/) (2022)
- [FLEX: FLEXible Federated Learning Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.06127/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

In cross-silo Federated Learning (FL), client selection is critical to ensure high model performance, yet it remains challenging due to data quality decompensation, budget constraints, and incentive compatibility. As training progresses, these factors exacerbate client heterogeneity and degrade global performance. Most existing approaches treat these challenges in isolation, making jointly optimizing multiple factors difficult. To address this, we propose Shapley-Bid Reputation Optimized Federated Learning (SBRO-FL), a unified framework integrating dynamic bidding, reputation modeling, and cost-aware selection. Clients submit bids based on their perceived data quality, and their contributions are evaluated using Shapley values to quantify their marginal impact on the global model. A reputation system, inspired by prospect theory, captures historical performance while penalizing inconsistency. The client selection problem is formulated as a 0-1 integer program that maximizes reputation-weighted utility under budget constraints. Experiments on FashionMNIST, EMNIST, CIFAR-10, and SVHN datasets show that SBRO-FL improves accuracy, convergence speed, and robustness, even in adversarial and low-bid interference scenarios. Our results highlight the importance of balancing data reliability, incentive compatibility, and cost efficiency to enable scalable and trustworthy FL deployments.