# Jigsaw-Puzzles: From Seeing to Understanding to Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20728 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.20728/

## Key facts

- Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 18 of its 40 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 27 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Spatial and embodied reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/spatial-and-embodied-reasoning/)
- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Embodied and 3D vision-language models](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/embodied-and-3d-vision-language-models/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 18 of 18)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.13923/) (2025)
- [Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12191/) (2024)
- [InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10479/) (2025)
- [MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13394/) (2023)
- [LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2111.02114/) (2021)
- [Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.11805/) (2023)
- [Phi-4-Mini Technical Report: Compact yet Powerful Multimodal Language Models via Mixture-of-LoRAs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.01743/) (2025)
- [Kimi-VL Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07491/) (2025)
- [Crossmodal-3600: A Massively Multilingual Multimodal Evaluation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12522/) (2022)
- [VisualPuzzles: Decoupling Multimodal Reasoning Evaluation from Domain Knowledge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.10342/) (2025)
- [LEGO-Puzzles: How Good Are MLLMs at Multi-Step Spatial Reasoning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19990/) (2025)
- [CAPTURe: Evaluating Spatial Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Occluded Object Counting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15485/) (2025)
- [Aya Vision: Advancing the Frontier of Multilingual Multimodality](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.08751/) (2025)
- [Mind the Gap: Benchmarking Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.19707/) (2025)
- [VGRP-Bench: Visual Grid Reasoning Puzzle Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.23064/) (2025)
- [Redundancy Principles for MLLMs Benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13953/) (2025)
- [CogLM: Tracking Cognitive Development of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.09150/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 9 of 9)

- [Why Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Enables MLLMs Preserve Prior Knowledge Better: A Data Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.23508/) (2025)
- [PuzLM: Solving Jigsaw Puzzles with Sequence-to-Sequence Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.06315/) (2025)
- [PuzzleCraft: Exploration-Aware Curriculum Learning for Puzzle-Based RLVR in VLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.14944/) (2025)
- [GRAID: Enhancing Spatial Reasoning of VLMs Through High-Fidelity Data Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.22118/) (2025)
- [Reasoning or Pattern Matching? Probing Large Vision-Language Models with Visual Puzzles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.13705/) (2026)
- [JigShape: Evaluating Visual-Geometric Reasoning in VLMs through Jigsaw Puzzles](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.27670/) (2026)
- [V-REX: Benchmarking Exploratory Visual Reasoning via Chain-of-Questions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.11995/) (2025)
- [ShredBench: Evaluating the Semantic Reasoning Capabilities of Multimodal LLMs in Document Reconstruction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.23813/) (2026)
- [JigSync: Gauge-Resolved Synchronization for Jigsaw Reassembly under Unknown Piece Orientation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.18379/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Spatial reasoning is a core component of human cognition, enabling individuals to perceive, comprehend, and interact with the physical world. It relies on a nuanced understanding of spatial structures and inter-object relationships, serving as the foundation for complex reasoning and decision-making. To investigate whether current vision-language models (VLMs) exhibit similar capability, we introduce Jigsaw-Puzzles, a novel benchmark consisting of 1,100 carefully curated real-world images with high spatial complexity. Based on this dataset, we design five tasks to rigorously evaluate VLMs' spatial perception, structural understanding, and reasoning capabilities, while deliberately minimizing reliance on domain-specific knowledge to better isolate and assess the general spatial reasoning capability. We conduct a comprehensive evaluation across 24 state-of-the-art VLMs. The results show that even the strongest model, Gemini-2.5-Pro, achieves only 77.14% overall accuracy and performs particularly poorly on the Order Generation task, with only 30.00% accuracy, far below the performance exceeding 90% achieved by human participants. This persistent gap underscores the need for continued progress, positioning Jigsaw-Puzzles as a challenging and diagnostic benchmark for advancing spatial reasoning research in VLMs. Our project page is at https://zesen01.github.io/jigsaw-puzzles.