# DCG-SQL: Enhancing In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Deep Contextual Schema Link Graph

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19956 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19956/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 31 of its 41 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 31)

- [BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.04805/) (2018)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1907.11692/) (2019)
- [Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.04906/) (2020)
- [Spider: A Large-Scale Human-Labeled Dataset for Complex and Cross-Domain Semantic Parsing and Text-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.08887/) (2018)
- [Self-Attention with Relative Position Representations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.02155/) (2018)
- [Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.08633/) (2021)
- [DIN-SQL: Decomposed In-Context Learning of Text-to-SQL with Self-Correction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.11015/) (2023)
- [RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.04942/) (2019)
- [Text-to-SQL Empowered by Large Language Models: A Benchmark Evaluation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.15363/) (2023)
- [Towards Complex Text-to-SQL in Cross-Domain Database with Intermediate Representation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1905.08205/) (2019)
- [RESDSQL: Decoupling Schema Linking and Skeleton Parsing for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05965/) (2023)
- [Unified Demonstration Retriever for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.04320/) (2023)
- [Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.12627/) (2020)
- [Structure-Grounded Pretraining for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.12773/) (2020)
- [Towards Robustness of Text-to-SQL Models against Synonym Substitution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.01065/) (2021)
- [MCS-SQL: Leveraging Multiple Prompts and Multiple-Choice Selection For Text-to-SQL Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.07467/) (2024)
- [Attention in Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.02181/) (2019)
- [Graphix-T5: Mixing Pre-Trained Transformers with Graph-Aware Layers for Text-to-SQL Parsing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.07507/) (2023)
- [Exploring Underexplored Limitations of Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05157/) (2021)
- [RASAT: Integrating Relational Structures into Pretrained Seq2Seq Model for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.06983/) (2022)
- [SyntaxSQLNet: Syntax Tree Networks for Complex and Cross-DomainText-to-SQL Task](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.05237/) (2018)
- [In-context Learning with Retrieved Demonstrations for Language Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.11624/) (2024)
- [ACT-SQL: In-Context Learning for Text-to-SQL with Automatically-Generated Chain-of-Thought](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.17342/) (2023)
- [How to Prompt LLMs for Text-to-SQL: A Study in Zero-shot, Single-domain, and Cross-domain Settings](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.11853/) (2023)
- [PET-SQL: A Prompt-Enhanced Two-Round Refinement of Text-to-SQL with Cross-consistency](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.09732/) (2024)
- [Interactive Text-to-SQL Generation via Editable Step-by-Step Explanations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.07372/) (2023)
- [Prompting GPT-3.5 for Text-to-SQL with De-semanticization and Skeleton Retrieval](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13301/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [PV-SQL: Synergizing Database Probing and Rule-based Verification for Text-to-SQL Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.17653/) (2026)
- [EXPO-SQL: Execution-based Clause-level Policy Optimization for Text-to-SQL](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.23693/) (2026)
- [LEAF-SQL: Level-wise Exploration with Adaptive Fine-graining for Text-to-SQL Skeleton Prediction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.09295/) (2026)
- [BIRD-History: A Benchmark for History-Driven Text-to-SQL with Fine-Grained Knowledge Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.29345/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-SQL, which translates a natural language question into an SQL query, has advanced with in-context learning of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing methods show little improvement in performance compared to randomly chosen demonstrations, and significant performance drops when smaller LLMs (e.g., Llama 3.1-8B) are used. This indicates that these methods heavily rely on the intrinsic capabilities of hyper-scaled LLMs, rather than effectively retrieving useful demonstrations. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for effectively retrieving demonstrations and generating SQL queries. We construct a Deep Contextual Schema Link Graph, which contains key information and semantic relationship between a question and its database schema items. This graph-based structure enables effective representation of Text-to-SQL samples and retrieval of useful demonstrations for in-context learning. Experimental results on the Spider benchmark demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, showing consistent improvements in SQL generation performance and efficiency across both hyper-scaled LLMs and small LLMs. The code is available at https://github.com/jjklle/DCG-SQL}{https://github.com/jjklle/DCG-SQL.