# TabularMath: Understanding Math Reasoning over Tables with Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19563 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19563/

## Key facts

- Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 25 of its 55 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 25 of 25)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Are NLP Models really able to Solve Simple Math Word Problems?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.07191/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Context](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.00093/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19437/) (2024)
- [FinQA: A Dataset of Numerical Reasoning over Financial Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.00122/) (2021)
- [GSM-Symbolic: Understanding the Limitations of Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.05229/) (2024)
- [Compositional Semantic Parsing on Semi-Structured Tables](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1508.00305/) (2015)
- [TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1909.02164/) (2019)
- [TAT-QA: A Question Answering Benchmark on a Hybrid of Tabular and Textual Content in Finance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.07624/) (2021)
- [ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.14373/) (2020)
- [Open Question Answering over Tables and Text](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.10439/) (2020)
- [TableLLM: Enabling Tabular Data Manipulation by LLMs in Real Office Usage Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19318/) (2024)
- [TableGPT: Towards Unifying Tables, Nature Language and Commands into One GPT](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.08674/) (2023)
- [AIT-QA: Question Answering Dataset over Complex Tables in the Airline Industry](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.12944/) (2021)
- [StructLM: Towards Building Generalist Models for Structured Knowledge Grounding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.16671/) (2024)
- [Neuro-Symbolic Data Generation for Math Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04857/) (2024)
- [LawGPT: Knowledge-Guided Data Generation and Its Application to Legal LLM](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.06572/) (2025)
- [Co-Matching: Towards Human-Machine Collaborative Legal Case Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.10248/) (2024)
- [SynFinTabs: A Dataset of Synthetic Financial Tables for Information and Table Extraction](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.04262/) (2024)
- [Tables Guide Vision: Learning to See the Heart through Tabular Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14998/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 5 of 5)

- [Semantic-Space Exploration and Exploitation in RLVR for LLM Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.23808/) (2025)
- [R1-RE: Cross-Domain Relation Extraction with RLVR](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.04642/) (2025)
- [Thinking with Tables: Enhancing Multi-Modal Tabular Understanding via Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.24004/) (2026)
- [LAST: Leveraging Tools as Hints to Enhance Spatial Reasoning for Multimodal Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.09712/) (2026)
- [NeSy-Route: A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark for Constrained Route Planning in Remote Sensing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.16307/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Mathematical reasoning has long been a key benchmark for evaluating large language models. Although substantial progress has been made on math word problems, the need for reasoning over tabular data in real-world applications has been overlooked. For instance, applications such as business intelligence demand not only multi-step numerical reasoning with tables but also robustness to incomplete or inconsistent information. However, comprehensive evaluation in this area is severely limited, constrained by the reliance on manually collected tables that are difficult to scale and the lack of coverage for potential traps encountered in real-world scenarios. To address this problem, we propose AutoT2T, a neuro-symbolic framework that controllably transforms math word problems into scalable and verified tabular reasoning tasks. Building on this pipeline, we develop TabularMath, a benchmark comprising four subsets that include both text-based and image-based tables, covering table complexity, table quality, and table representation dimensions. Our study reveals three key observations: (1) Table complexity and reasoning difficulty impact reasoning performance jointly; (2) Low-quality tables pose severe risks to reliable reasoning in current LLMs; (3) Different table modalities show similar trends, with text-based tables typically being easier for models to reason over. In-depth analyses are conducted for each observation to guide future research.
