# CODE-DITING: A Reasoning-Based Metric for Functional Alignment in Code Evaluation

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19502 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19502/

## Key facts

- Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reasoning for agents, planning and code, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 35 of its 46 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reasoning for agents, planning and code](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reasoning-for-agents-planning-and-code/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 35)

- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05685/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2107.03374/) (2021)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.06180/) (2023)
- [Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.01852/) (2015)
- [A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15594/) (2024)
- [Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.01210/) (2023)
- [Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12186/) (2024)
- [DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligence](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.14196/) (2024)
- [BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructions](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.15877/) (2024)
- [From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.16594/) (2024)
- [CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.10297/) (2020)
- [LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methods](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.05579/) (2024)
- [Large Language Models for Software Engineering: A Systematic Literature Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.10620/) (2023)
- [PiSSA: Principal Singular Values and Singular Vectors Adaptation of Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.02948/) (2024)
- [LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision and the Road Ahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04834/) (2024)
- [OpenCoder: The Open Cookbook for Top-Tier Code Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.04905/) (2024)
- [Preference Leakage: A Contamination Problem in LLM-as-a-judge](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01534/) (2025)
- [KodCode: A Diverse, Challenging, and Verifiable Synthetic Dataset for Coding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02951/) (2025)
- [CodeBERTScore: Evaluating Code Generation with Pretrained Models of Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.05527/) (2023)
- [CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.09043/) (2023)
- [ICE-Score: Instructing Large Language Models to Evaluate Code](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.14317/) (2023)
- [CodeJudge: Evaluating Code Generation with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02184/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought in Neural Code Generation: From and For Lightweight Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.05562/) (2023)
- [Benchmarks and Metrics for Evaluations of Code Generation: A Critical Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.12655/) (2024)
- [Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Code Change Related Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.02824/) (2024)
- [An Empirical Study of Retrieval-Augmented Code Generation: Challenges and Opportunities](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.13742/) (2025)
- [Efficient and Green Large Language Models for Software Engineering: Literature Review, Vision, and the Road Ahead](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.04566/) (2024)
- [From Code to Courtroom: LLMs as the New Software Judges](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.02246/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 2 of 2)

- [CodeJudgeBench: Benchmarking LLM-as-a-Judge for Coding Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.10535/) (2025)
- [Semantic Consensus Decoding: Backdoor Defense for Verilog Code Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04195/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Trustworthy evaluation methods for code snippets play a crucial role in neural code generation. Traditional methods, which either rely on reference solutions or require executable test cases, have inherent limitation in flexibility and scalability. The recent LLM-as-Judge methodology offers a promising alternative by directly evaluating functional consistency between the problem description and the generated code. To systematically understand the landscape of these LLM-as-Judge methods, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study across three diverse datasets. Our investigation reveals the pros and cons of two categories of LLM-as-Judge methods: the methods based on general foundation models can achieve good performance but require complex prompts and lack explainability, while the methods based on reasoning foundation models provide better explainability with simpler prompts but demand substantial computational resources due to their large parameter sizes. To address these limitations, we propose CODE-DITING, a novel code evaluation method that balances accuracy, efficiency and explainability. We develop a data distillation framework that effectively transfers reasoning capabilities from DeepSeek-R1671B to our CODE-DITING 1.5B and 7B models, significantly enhancing evaluation explainability and reducing the computational cost. With the majority vote strategy in the inference process, CODE-DITING 1.5B outperforms all models with the same magnitude of parameters and achieves performance which would normally exhibit in a model with 5 times of parameter scale. CODE-DITING 7B surpasses GPT-4o and DeepSeek-V3 671B, even though it only uses 1% of the parameter volume of these large models. Further experiments show that CODEDITING is robust to preference leakage and can serve as a promising alternative for code evaluation.