# MetaGMT: Improving Actionable Interpretability of Graph Multilinear Networks via Meta-Learning Filtration

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.19445 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.19445/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 26 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 14 of 14)

- [Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1609.02907/) (2016)
- [Graph Attention Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.10903/) (2017)
- [How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.00826/) (2018)
- [GNNExplainer: Generating Explanations for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03894/) (2019)
- [Graph Neural Networks for Social Recommendation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.07243/) (2019)
- [Parameterized Explainer for Graph Neural Network](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2011.04573/) (2020)
- [On Explainability of Graph Neural Networks via Subgraph Explorations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2102.05152/) (2021)
- [PGM-Explainer: Probabilistic Graphical Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.05788/) (2020)
- [Interpretable and Generalizable Graph Learning via Stochastic Attention Mechanism](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.12987/) (2022)
- [Evaluating Explainability for Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2208.09339/) (2022)
- [Hierarchical Graph Pooling with Structure Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.05954/) (2019)
- [Utilising Graph Machine Learning within Drug Discovery and Development](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.05716/) (2020)
- [A Meta-Learning Approach for Training Explainable Graph Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.09426/) (2021)
- [How Interpretable Are Interpretable Graph Neural Networks?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.07955/) (2024)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The growing adoption of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance demands reliable explanations of their decision-making processes. While inherently interpretable GNN architectures like Graph Multi-linear Networks (GMT) have emerged, they remain vulnerable to generating explanations based on spurious correlations, potentially undermining trust in critical applications. We present MetaGMT, a meta-learning framework that enhances explanation fidelity through a novel bi-level optimization approach. We demonstrate that MetaGMT significantly improves both explanation quality (AUC-ROC, Precision@K) and robustness to spurious patterns, across BA-2Motifs, MUTAG, and SP-Motif benchmarks. Our approach maintains competitive classification accuracy while producing more faithful explanations (with an increase up to 8% of Explanation ROC on SP-Motif 0.5) compared to baseline methods. These advancements in interpretability could enable safer deployment of GNNs in sensitive domains by (1) facilitating model debugging through more reliable explanations, (2) supporting targeted retraining when biases are identified, and (3) enabling meaningful human oversight. By addressing the critical challenge of explanation reliability, our work contributes to building more trustworthy and actionable GNN systems for real-world applications.