# Multi-Party Conversational Agents: A Survey

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18845 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18845/

## Key facts

- Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 91 of its 190 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks](https://mlsanity.com/agents/general-llm-agent-frameworks-and-benchmarks/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 91)

- [The Llama 3 Herd of Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2407.21783/) (2024)
- [XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1906.08237/) (2019)
- [Personalizing Dialogue Agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07243/) (2018)
- [DailyDialog: A Manually Labelled Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1710.03957/) (2017)
- [MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1810.02508/) (2018)
- [SAMSum Corpus: A Human-annotated Dialogue Dataset for Abstractive Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.12237/) (2019)
- [Wizard of Wikipedia: Knowledge-Powered Conversational agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.01241/) (2018)
- [QMSum: A New Benchmark for Query-based Multi-domain Meeting Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.05938/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models Fail on Trivial Alterations to Theory-of-Mind Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.08399/) (2023)
- [PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.02547/) (2023)
- [Evaluating Large Language Models in Theory of Mind Tasks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.02083/) (2023)
- [DialogueRNN: An Attentive RNN for Emotion Detection in Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.00405/) (2018)
- [The Ubuntu Dialogue Corpus: A Large Dataset for Research in Unstructured Multi-Turn Dialogue Systems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1506.08909/) (2015)
- [Emotion Detection on TV Show Transcripts with Sequence-based Convolutional Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.04299/) (2017)
- [Minding Language Models' (Lack of) Theory of Mind: A Plug-and-Play Multi-Character Belief Tracker](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.00924/) (2023)
- [EmotionLines: An Emotion Corpus of Multi-Party Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.08379/) (2018)
- [DialogXL: All-in-One XLNet for Multi-Party Conversation Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.08695/) (2020)
- [Speaker-Aware BERT for Multi-Turn Response Selection in Retrieval-Based Chatbots](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.03588/) (2020)
- [Multi-View Sequence-to-Sequence Models with Conversational Structure for Abstractive Dialogue Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.01672/) (2020)
- [Beyond Turn-Based Interfaces: Synchronous LLMs as Full-Duplex Dialogue Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.15594/) (2024)
- [TofuEval: Evaluating Hallucinations of LLMs on Topic-Focused Dialogue Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13249/) (2024)
- [Summ^N: A Multi-Stage Summarization Framework for Long Input Dialogues and Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.10150/) (2021)
- [Molweni: A Challenge Multiparty Dialogues-based Machine Reading Comprehension Dataset with Discourse Structure](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.05080/) (2020)
- [MMDialog: A Large-scale Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset Towards Multi-modal Open-domain Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.05719/) (2022)
- [Is ChatGPT Equipped with Emotional Dialogue Capabilities?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09582/) (2023)
- [Multi-Party Chat: Conversational Agents in Group Settings with Humans and Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.13835/) (2023)
- [MuMA-ToM: Multi-modal Multi-Agent Theory of Mind](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2408.12574/) (2024)
- [BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.16491/) (2024)
- [M2FNet: Multi-modal Fusion Network for Emotion Recognition in Conversation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02187/) (2022)
- [Language Model as an Annotator: Exploring DialoGPT for Dialogue Summarization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2105.12544/) (2021)

## Built on by (most cited first, 7 of 7)

- [Evaluating Long-Horizon Memory for Multi-Party Collaborative Dialogues](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.01313/) (2026)
- [Adaptive Turn-Taking for Real-time Multi-Party Voice Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.13544/) (2026)
- [ProEvent: An Event-centric Benchmark for Proactive Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.17701/) (2026)
- [Designing Explainable Conversational Agentic Systems for Guaran'i Speakers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.05743/) (2026)
- [Leveraging Turn-taking Dynamics for Intent Recognition in Multi-party Conversations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.28926/) (2026)
- [Speak for Me: Giving LLMs the Situational Awareness to Participate in a Meeting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.03923/) (2026)
- [EGCForest: Structured Agent Memory Organization for Enterprise Group Chats](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2610.19836/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Multi-party Conversational Agents (MPCAs) are systems designed to engage in dialogue with more than two participants simultaneously. Unlike traditional two-party agents, designing MPCAs faces additional challenges due to the need to interpret both utterance semantics and social dynamics. This survey explores recent progress in MPCAs by addressing three key questions: 1) Can agents model each participants' mental states? (State of Mind Modeling); 2) Can they properly understand the dialogue content? (Semantic Understanding); and 3) Can they reason about and predict future conversation flow? (Agent Action Modeling). We review methods ranging from classical machine learning to Large Language Models (LLMs) and multi-modal systems. Our analysis underscores Theory of Mind (ToM) as essential for building intelligent MPCAs and highlights multi-modal understanding as a promising yet underexplored direction. Finally, this survey offers guidance to future researchers on developing more capable MPCAs.
