# Benchmarking and Rethinking Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18690 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18690/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 27 of its 78 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Knowledge- and tool-augmented reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/knowledge-and-tool-augmented-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 27 of 27)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [GPT-4o System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.21276/) (2024)
- [Mistral 7B](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.06825/) (2023)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Fast Model Editing at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.11309/) (2021)
- [AdaLoRA: Adaptive Budget Allocation for Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.10512/) (2023)
- [Learning to Reason under Off-Policy Guidance](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.14945/) (2025)
- [AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.02355/) (2024)
- [Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solve](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.13638/) (2023)
- [A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.01286/) (2024)
- [A Review on Language Models as Knowledge Bases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.06031/) (2022)
- [Editable Neural Networks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2004.00345/) (2020)
- [Physics of Language Models: Part 3.3, Knowledge Capacity Scaling Laws](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.05405/) (2024)
- [Strong Model Collapse](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.04840/) (2024)
- [Interpreting Key Mechanisms of Factual Recall in Transformer-Based Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.19521/) (2024)
- [The Mirage of Model Editing: Revisiting Evaluation in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.11177/) (2025)
- [DyKnow: Dynamically Verifying Time-Sensitive Factual Knowledge in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.08700/) (2024)
- [Knowledge Updating? No More Model Editing! Just Selective Contextual Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.05212/) (2025)
- [Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.01436/) (2024)
- [Consecutive Batch Model Editing with HooK Layers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.05330/) (2024)
- [Event-level Knowledge Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.13093/) (2024)
- [MEMoE: Enhancing Model Editing with Mixture of Experts Adaptors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.19086/) (2024)
- [Efficiently Quantifying and Mitigating Ripple Effects in Model Editing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07825/) (2024)
- [K-Edit: Language Model Editing with Contextual Knowledge Awareness](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.10626/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge editing aims to update the embedded knowledge within Large Language Models (LLMs). However, existing approaches, whether through parameter modification or external memory integration, often suffer from inconsistent evaluation objectives and experimental setups. To address this gap, we conduct a comprehensive benchmarking study. In addition to fact-level datasets, we introduce more complex event-based datasets and general-purpose datasets drawn from other tasks. Our evaluation covers both instruction-tuned and reasoning-oriented LLMs, under a realistic autoregressive inference setting rather than teacher-forced decoding. Beyond single-edit assessments, we also evaluate multi-edit scenarios to better reflect practical demands. We employ four evaluation dimensions, including portability, and compare all recent methods against a simple and straightforward baseline named Selective Contextual Reasoning (SCR). Empirical results reveal that parameter-based editing methods perform poorly under realistic conditions. In contrast, SCR consistently outperforms them across all settings. This study offers new insights into the limitations of current knowledge editing methods and highlights the potential of context-based reasoning as a more robust alternative.