# Cross-Lingual Pitfalls: Automatic Probing Cross-Lingual Weakness of Multilingual Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18673 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18673/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- First posted on arXiv 24 May 2025.

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [ProbeLLM: Automating Principled Diagnosis of LLM Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.12966/) (2026)
- [Evaluating the Limits of Large Language Models in Multilingual Legal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.22472/) (2025)
- [Multilingual Large Language Models do not comprehend all natural languages to equal degrees](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.20065/) (2026)
- [GTA: Graph Theory Agent and Benchmark for Algorithmic Graph Reasoning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.12265/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in Natural Language Processing (NLP), yet their cross-lingual performance consistency remains a significant challenge. This paper introduces a novel methodology for efficiently identifying inherent cross-lingual weaknesses in LLMs. Our approach leverages beam search and LLM-based simulation to generate bilingual question pairs that expose performance discrepancies between English and target languages. We construct a new dataset of over 6,000 bilingual pairs across 16 languages using this methodology, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing weaknesses even in state-of-the-art models. The extensive experiments demonstrate that our method precisely and cost-effectively pinpoints cross-lingual weaknesses, consistently revealing over 50% accuracy drops in target languages across a wide range of models. Moreover, further experiments investigate the relationship between linguistic similarity and cross-lingual weaknesses, revealing that linguistically related languages share similar performance patterns and benefit from targeted post-training. Code is available at https://github.com/xzx34/Cross-Lingual-Pitfalls.
