# NFT: Bridging Supervised Learning and Reinforcement Learning in Math Reasoning

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18116 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.18116/

## Key facts

- Cited by 38 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 55 of its 70 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 23 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Reinforcement learning for reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/lr/reinforcement-learning-for-reasoning/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 55)

- [GPT-4 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.08774/) (2023)
- [Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2203.02155/) (2022)
- [Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.06347/) (2017)
- [Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.09288/) (2023)
- [DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.03300/) (2024)
- [Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.18290/) (2023)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [Neural Discrete Representation Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1711.00937/) (2017)
- [Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1706.03741/) (2017)
- [Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.08073/) (2022)
- [DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.14476/) (2025)
- [Trust Region Policy Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.05477/) (2015)
- [Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1308.3432/) (2013)
- [HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Framework](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.19256/) (2024)
- [Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.14858/) (2022)
- [Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspective](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.20783/) (2025)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2402.14008/) (2024)
- [Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2409.12122/) (2024)
- [Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.15124/) (2024)
- [Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.13837/) (2025)
- [Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.08935/) (2023)
- [A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.12036/) (2023)
- [RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignment](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06767/) (2023)
- [SFT Memorizes, RL Generalizes: A Comparative Study of Foundation Model Post-training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.17161/) (2025)
- [ORPO: Monolithic Preference Optimization without Reference Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2403.07691/) (2024)
- [SimpleRL-Zoo: Investigating and Taming Zero Reinforcement Learning for Open Base Models in the Wild](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.18892/) (2025)
- [Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.01456/) (2025)
- [Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Review](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1805.00909/) (2018)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.14245/) (2025)
- [DiffusionNFT: Online Diffusion Reinforcement with Forward Process](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.16117/) (2025)
- [A Survey of Reinforcement Learning for Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.08827/) (2025)
- [On the Generalization of SFT: A Reinforcement Learning Perspective with Reward Rectification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.05629/) (2025)
- [wd1: Weighted Policy Optimization for Reasoning in Diffusion Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.08838/) (2025)
- [Beyond Correctness: Harmonizing Process and Outcome Rewards through RL Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03403/) (2025)
- [CURE: Critical-Token-Guided Re-Concatenation for Entropy-Collapse Prevention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.11016/) (2025)
- [Rethinking the Design Space of Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Models: On the Importance of Likelihood Estimation Beyond Loss Design](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04663/) (2026)
- [Position: The Hidden Costs and Measurement Gaps of Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21882/) (2025)
- [Reinforcing Few-step Generators via Reward-Tilted Distribution Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.26108/) (2026)
- [Explore Data Left Behind in Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.04800/) (2025)
- [π-StepNFT: Wider Space Needs Finer Steps in Online RL for Flow-based VLAs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.02083/) (2026)
- [Diffusion Reinforcement Learning via Centered Reward Distillation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.14128/) (2026)
- [Contrastive Distribution Matching for Amortized Sequential Monte Carlo in Discrete Diffusion](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.23346/) (2026)
- [Recall-Extend Dynamics: Enhancing Small Language Models through Controlled Exploration and Refined Offline Integration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16677/) (2025)
- [Bridging Information Asymmetry: A Hierarchical Framework for Deterministic Blind Face Restoration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19506/) (2026)
- [Beyond Rejection Sampling: Trajectory Fusion for Scaling Mathematical Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.04391/) (2026)
- [Supervised Fine-Tuning versus Reinforcement Learning: A Study of Post-Training Methods for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.13985/) (2026)
- [SHIFT: Motion Alignment in Video Diffusion Models with Adversarial Hybrid Fine-Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.17426/) (2026)
- [FP4 Explore, BF16 Train: Diffusion Reinforcement Learning via Efficient Rollout Scaling](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.06916/) (2026)
- [Compatibility-Aware Dynamic Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2606.11206/) (2026)
- [Scaling Reinforcement Learning for Diffusion Models via Velocity Matching](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2608.23664/) (2026)
- [Reasoning Pattern Matters: Learning to Reason without Human Rationales](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.12643/) (2025)
- [Reg-DPO: SFT-Regularized Direct Preference Optimization with GT-Pair for Improving Video Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.01450/) (2025)
- [GIFT: Reconciling Post-Training Objectives via Variational Finite-Temperature Gibbs Initialization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.09233/) (2026)
- [The Role of Entropy in Visual Grounding: Analysis and Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.06726/) (2025)
- [Decouple before Integration: Test-time Synthesis of SFT and RLVR Task Vectors](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.00610/) (2026)
- [Break the Block: Dynamic-size Reasoning Blocks for Diffusion Large Language Models via Monotonic Entropy Descent with Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.02263/) (2026)
- [FlowCPO: A Unified Divergence View of Preference Alignment for Flow Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.09905/) (2026)
- [Mimic Human Cognition, Master Multi-Image Reasoning: A Meta-Action Framework for Enhanced Visual Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.07298/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has played a central role in the recent surge of LLMs' math abilities by enabling self-improvement through binary verifier signals. In contrast, Supervised Learning (SL) is rarely considered for such verification-driven training, largely due to its heavy reliance on reference answers and inability to reflect on mistakes. In this work, we challenge the prevailing notion that self-improvement is exclusive to RL and propose Negative-aware Fine-Tuning (NFT) -- a supervised approach that enables LLMs to reflect on their failures and improve autonomously with no external teachers. In online training, instead of throwing away self-generated negative answers, NFT constructs an implicit negative policy to model them. This implicit policy is parameterized with the same positive LLM we target to optimize on positive data, enabling direct policy optimization on all LLMs' generations. We conduct experiments on 7B and 32B models in math reasoning tasks. Results consistently show that through the additional leverage of negative feedback, NFT significantly improves over SL baselines like Rejection sampling Fine-Tuning, matching or even surpassing leading RL algorithms like GRPO and DAPO. Furthermore, we demonstrate that NFT and GRPO are actually equivalent in strict-on-policy training, even though they originate from entirely different theoretical foundations. Our experiments and theoretical findings bridge the gap between SL and RL methods in binary-feedback learning systems.