# MCP-RADAR: A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Evaluating Tool Use Capabilities in Large Language Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16700 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16700/

## Key facts

- Cited by 48 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Tool learning and function calling, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use.
- Builds on 30 of its 52 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM agents and tool use / [Tool learning and function calling](https://mlsanity.com/agents/tool-learning-and-function-calling/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 30)

- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2201.11903/) (2022)
- [Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2110.14168/) (2021)
- [Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2009.03300/) (2020)
- [Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Dataset](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.03874/) (2021)
- [Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.04761/) (2023)
- [Program Synthesis with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2108.07732/) (2021)
- [ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.16789/) (2023)
- [Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.15334/) (2023)
- [AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.03688/) (2023)
- [ALFWorld: Aligning Text and Embodied Environments for Interactive Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2010.03768/) (2020)
- [GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.12983/) (2023)
- [Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2001.07676/) (2020)
- [AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.06364/) (2023)
- [API-Bank: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tool-Augmented LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.08244/) (2023)
- [ToolAlpaca: Generalized Tool Learning for Language Models with 3000 Simulated Cases](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.05301/) (2023)
- [Chameleon: Plug-and-Play Compositional Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.09842/) (2023)
- [MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedback](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.10691/) (2023)
- [ToRA: A Tool-Integrated Reasoning Agent for Mathematical Problem Solving](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2309.17452/) (2023)
- [ToolQA: A Dataset for LLM Question Answering with External Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.13304/) (2023)
- [MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2310.03128/) (2023)
- [TALM: Tool Augmented Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2205.12255/) (2022)
- [TaskMatrix.AI: Completing Tasks by Connecting Foundation Models with Millions of APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.16434/) (2023)
- [RestGPT: Connecting Large Language Models with Real-World RESTful APIs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.06624/) (2023)
- [On the Tool Manipulation Capability of Open-source Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.16504/) (2023)
- [Tool Documentation Enables Zero-Shot Tool-Usage with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2308.00675/) (2023)
- [WorkBench: a Benchmark Dataset for Agents in a Realistic Workplace Setting](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2405.00823/) (2024)
- [Interactive Natural Language Processing](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13246/) (2023)
- [MTU-Bench: A Multi-granularity Tool-Use Benchmark for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.11710/) (2024)
- [AutoFeedback: An LLM-based Framework for Efficient and Accurate API Request Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2410.06943/) (2024)

## Built on by (most cited first, 30 of 48)

- [MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.20453/) (2025)
- [MCP-Universe: Benchmarking Large Language Models with Real-World Model Context Protocol Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.14704/) (2025)
- [The Tool Decathlon: Benchmarking Language Agents for Diverse, Realistic, and Long-Horizon Task Execution](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.25726/) (2025)
- [TOUCAN: Synthesizing 1.5M Tool-Agentic Data from Real-World MCP Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01179/) (2025)
- [MCP-Atlas: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Tool-Use Competency with Real MCP Servers](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.00933/) (2026)
- [LiveMCPBench: Can Agents Navigate an Ocean of MCP Tools?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.01780/) (2025)
- [MCPMark: A Benchmark for Stress-Testing Realistic and Comprehensive MCP Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.24002/) (2025)
- [Gaia2: Benchmarking LLM Agents on Dynamic and Asynchronous Environments](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2602.11964/) (2026)
- [ClawsBench: Evaluating Capability and Safety of LLM Productivity Agents in Simulated Workspaces](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05172/) (2026)
- [MCPToolBench++: A Large Scale AI Agent Model Context Protocol MCP Tool Use Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.07575/) (2025)
- [MCP-AgentBench: Evaluating Real-World Language Agent Performance with MCP-Mediated Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.09734/) (2025)
- [ARE: Scaling Up Agent Environments and Evaluations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.17158/) (2025)
- [SkillCraft: Can LLM Agents Learn to Use Tools Skillfully?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.00718/) (2026)
- [OSWorld-MCP: Benchmarking MCP Tool Invocation In Computer-Use Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24563/) (2025)
- [From Static Templates to Dynamic Runtime Graphs: A Survey of Workflow Optimization for LLM Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2603.22386/) (2026)
- [LiveMCP-101: Stress Testing and Diagnosing MCP-enabled Agents on Challenging Queries](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.15760/) (2025)
- [MCPVerse: An Expansive, Real-World Benchmark for Agentic Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.16260/) (2025)
- [Toward Efficient Agents: Memory, Tool learning, and Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.14192/) (2026)
- [ToolPRMBench: Evaluating and Advancing Process Reward Models for Tool-using Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.12294/) (2026)
- [MCP-Flow: Facilitating LLM Agents to Master Real-World, Diverse and Scaling MCP Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.24284/) (2025)
- [M^3-Bench: Multi-Modal, Multi-Hop, Multi-Threaded Tool-Using MLLM Agent Benchmark](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2511.17729/) (2025)
- [Routine: A Structural Planning Framework for LLM Agent System in Enterprise](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.14447/) (2025)
- [IoT-MCP: Bridging LLMs and IoT Systems Through Model Context Protocol](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.01260/) (2025)
- [MCPAgentBench: A Real-world Task Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Agent MCP Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.24565/) (2025)
- [ACE-Router: Generalizing History-Aware Routing from MCP Tools to the Agent Web](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.08276/) (2026)
- [TheMCPCompany: Creating General-purpose Agents with Task-specific Tools](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.19286/) (2025)
- [Can Agents Generalize to the Open World? Unveiling the Fragility of Static Training in Tool Use](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.01084/) (2026)
- [Help or Hurdle? Rethinking Model Context Protocol-Augmented Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.12566/) (2025)
- [InfoMosaic-Bench: Evaluating Multi-Source Information Seeking in Tool-Augmented Agents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2510.02271/) (2025)
- [Benchmark for Planning and Control with Large Language Model Agents: Blocksworld with Model Context Protocol](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.03955/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve from passive text generators to active reasoning agents capable of interacting with external tools, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a key standardized framework for dynamic tool discovery and orchestration. Despite its widespread industry adoption, existing evaluation methods do not adequately assess tool utilization capabilities under this new paradigm. To address this gap, this paper introduces MCP-RADAR, the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLM performance within the MCP framework. MCP-RADAR features a challenging dataset of 507 tasks spanning six domains: mathematical reasoning, web search, email, calendar, file management, and terminal operations. It quantifies performance based on two primary criteria: answer correctness and operational accuracy. To closely emulate real-world usage, our evaluation employs both authentic MCP tools and high-fidelity simulations of official tools. Unlike traditional benchmarks that rely on subjective human evaluation or binary success metrics, MCP-RADAR adopts objective, quantifiable measurements across multiple task domains, including computational resource efficiency and the number of successful tool-invocation rounds. Our evaluation of leading closed-source and open-source LLMs reveals distinct capability profiles and highlights a significant trade-off between accuracy and efficiency. Our findings provide actionable insights for both LLM developers and tool creators, establishing a standardized methodology applicable to the broader LLM agent ecosystem. All implementations, configurations, and datasets are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MCPRadar-B143.