# The First Impression Problem: Internal Bias Triggers Overthinking in Reasoning Models

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16448 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16448/

## Key facts

- Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Test-time compute and efficient thinking, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning.
- Builds on 28 of its 45 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

## Placed in

- LLM reasoning / [Test-time compute and efficient thinking](https://mlsanity.com/lr/test-time-compute-and-efficient-thinking/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 28 of 28)

- [DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12948/) (2025)
- [Qwen2.5 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.15115/) (2024)
- [OpenAI o1 System Card](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.16720/) (2024)
- [Kimi k1.5: Scaling Reinforcement Learning with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.12599/) (2025)
- [DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.19437/) (2024)
- [Do NOT Think That Much for 2+3=? On the Overthinking of o1-Like LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.21187/) (2024)
- [Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.16419/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Don't Always Say What They Think](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.05410/) (2025)
- [Alignment faking in large language models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2412.14093/) (2024)
- [Chain of Draft: Thinking Faster by Writing Less](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.18600/) (2025)
- [Towards Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Reinforced Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2501.09686/) (2025)
- [Training Language Models to Reason Efficiently](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2502.04463/) (2025)
- [Dynamic Early Exit in Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.15895/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Can Be Effective Without Thinking](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.09858/) (2025)
- [Sycophancy to Subterfuge: Investigating Reward-Tampering in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2406.10162/) (2024)
- [Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08679/) (2025)
- [Reasoning Models Know When They're Right: Probing Hidden States for Self-Verification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.05419/) (2025)
- [DAST: Difficulty-Adaptive Slow-Thinking for Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.04472/) (2025)
- [Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.00127/) (2025)
- [Learning to Break the Loop: Analyzing and Mitigating Repetitions for Neural Text Generation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2206.02369/) (2022)
- [System 2 Attention (is something you might need too)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.11829/) (2023)
- [Learn to Reason Efficiently with Adaptive Length-based Reward Shaping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.15612/) (2025)
- [SEAL: Steerable Reasoning Calibration of Large Language Models for Free](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.07986/) (2025)
- [Long-Short Chain-of-Thought Mixture Supervised Fine-Tuning Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.03469/) (2025)
- [Ada-R1: Hybrid-CoT via Bi-Level Adaptive Reasoning Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.21659/) (2025)
- [Controllable Context Sensitivity and the Knob Behind It](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2411.07404/) (2024)
- [Identifying and Mitigating the Influence of the Prior Distribution in Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2504.12585/) (2025)
- [SCoRE: Benchmarking Long-Chain Reasoning in Commonsense Scenarios](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.06218/) (2025)

## Built on by (most cited first, 10 of 10)

- [A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.03871/) (2025)
- [Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2507.09662/) (2025)
- [Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Large Reasoning Models: A Survey of Training, Inference, and Failures](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2601.19928/) (2026)
- [Med-REFL: Medical Reasoning Enhancement via Self-Corrected Fine-grained Reflection](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2506.13793/) (2025)
- [Answering the Unanswerable Is to Err Knowingly: Analyzing and Mitigating Abstention Failures in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2508.18760/) (2025)
- [CoreThink: A Symbolic Reasoning Layer to reason over Long Horizon Tasks with LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.00971/) (2025)
- [TREK: A Travel Reasoning and Evaluation Kit for LLM Agents in Complex Trip Planning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.26977/) (2026)
- [Implicit Compression Regularization: Concise Reasoning via Internal Shorter Distributions in RL Post-Training](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2605.07316/) (2026)
- [Graph-Based Chain-of-Thought Pruning for Reducing Redundant Reflections in Reasoning LLMs](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.05643/) (2026)
- [Scaling of Capability and Efficiency at Inference Time in Large Reasoning Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2609.27166/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Reasoning models often exhibit overthinking, characterized by redundant reasoning steps. We identify internal bias elicited by the input question as a key trigger of such behavior. Upon encountering a problem, the model immediately forms a preliminary guess about the answer, which we term an internal bias since it may not be explicitly generated, and it arises without systematic reasoning. When this guess conflicts with its subsequent reasoning, the model tends to engage in excessive reflection, resulting in wasted computation. We validate the association between internal bias and overthinking across multiple models and diverse reasoning tasks. To demonstrate the causal relationship more rigorously, we conduct two counterfactual interventions, showing that removing the input question after the model reduces the redundant reasoning across various complex reasoning tasks, and manually injecting bias affects overthinking accordingly. Further interpretability experiments suggest that excessive attention to the input question serves as a key mechanism through which internal bias influences subsequent reasoning trajectories. Finally, we evaluated several methods aimed at mitigating overthinking, yet the influence of internal bias persisted under all conditions.