# Performance Guaranteed Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning: A Sliding Mode Approach

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16403 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16403/

## Key facts

- No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

## Builds on (most cited first, 20 of 20)

- [Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1602.05629/) (2016)
- [How To Backdoor Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1807.00459/) (2018)
- [Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Rates](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1803.01498/) (2018)
- [Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.11815/) (2019)
- [Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1811.12470/) (2018)
- [FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrapping](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.13995/) (2020)
- [The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantium](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1802.07927/) (2018)
- [A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1902.06156/) (2019)
- [Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1911.07963/) (2019)
- [Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1804.00308/) (2018)
- [Towards Poisoning of Deep Learning Algorithms with Back-gradient Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.08689/) (2017)
- [Fall of Empires: Breaking Byzantine-tolerant SGD by Inner Product Manipulation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1903.03936/) (2019)
- [Learning from History for Byzantine Robust Optimization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2012.10333/) (2020)
- [Learning Feature Pyramids for Human Pose Estimation](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1708.01101/) (2017)
- [Universal Multi-Party Poisoning Attacks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1809.03474/) (2018)
- [FL-Defender: Combating Targeted Attacks in Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2207.00872/) (2022)
- [Denial-of-Service or Fine-Grained Control: Towards Flexible Model Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2304.10783/) (2023)
- [PrivColl: Practical Privacy-Preserving Collaborative Machine Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2007.06953/) (2020)
- [AGRAMPLIFIER: Defending Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks Through Local Update Amplification](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2311.06996/) (2023)
- [Not All Edges are Equally Robust: Evaluating the Robustness of Ranking-Based Federated Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2503.08976/) (2025)

## Abstract (arXiv)

Manipulation of local training data and local updates, i.e., the poisoning attack, is the main threat arising from the collaborative nature of the federated learning (FL) paradigm. Most existing poisoning attacks aim to manipulate local data/models in a way that causes denial-of-service (DoS) issues. In this paper, we introduce a novel attack method, named Federated Learning Sliding Attack (FedSA) scheme, aiming at precisely introducing the extent of poisoning in a subtle controlled manner. It operates with a predefined objective, such as reducing global model's prediction accuracy by 10%. FedSA integrates robust nonlinear control-Sliding Mode Control (SMC) theory with model poisoning attacks. It can manipulate the updates from malicious clients to drive the global model towards a compromised state, achieving this at a controlled and inconspicuous rate. Additionally, leveraging the robust control properties of FedSA allows precise control over the convergence bounds, enabling the attacker to set the global accuracy of the poisoned model to any desired level. Experimental results demonstrate that FedSA can accurately achieve a predefined global accuracy with fewer malicious clients while maintaining a high level of stealth and adjustable learning rates.