# An Empirical Study on Configuring In-Context Learning Demonstrations for Unleashing MLLMs' Sentimental Perception Capability

arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16193 · HTML: https://mlsanity.com/paper/2505.16193/

## Key facts

- Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026).
- Placed in Multimodal emotion understanding, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models.
- Builds on 38 of its 64 references that are in the map.
- First posted on arXiv 22 May 2025.

## Placed in

- Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models / [Multimodal emotion understanding](https://mlsanity.com/mllm/multimodal-emotion-understanding/)

## Builds on (most cited first, 30 of 38)

- [Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2103.00020/) (2021)
- [Language Models are Few-Shot Learners](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2005.14165/) (2020)
- [High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2112.10752/) (2021)
- [BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2301.12597/) (2023)
- [Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2204.14198/) (2022)
- [PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Model](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.03378/) (2023)
- [Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attention](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1502.03044/) (2015)
- [What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2101.06804/) (2021)
- [Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2104.08786/) (2021)
- [Large Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2307.05782/) (2023)
- [Language Is Not All You Need: Aligning Perception with Language Models](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.14045/) (2023)
- [Tensor Fusion Network for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1707.07250/) (2017)
- [OBELICS: An Open Web-Scale Filtered Dataset of Interleaved Image-Text Documents](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2306.16527/) (2023)
- [An Empirical Study of GPT-3 for Few-Shot Knowledge-Based VQA](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2109.05014/) (2021)
- [Active Example Selection for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2211.04486/) (2022)
- [Self-Adaptive In-Context Learning: An Information Compression Perspective for In-Context Example Selection and Ordering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.10375/) (2022)
- [What Makes Multi-modal Learning Better than Single (Provably)](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.04538/) (2021)
- [What In-Context Learning "Learns" In-Context: Disentangling Task Recognition and Task Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.09731/) (2023)
- [Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis : A Survey](https://mlsanity.com/paper/1801.07883/) (2018)
- [Diverse Demonstrations Improve In-context Compositional Generalization](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.06800/) (2022)
- [Exploring the Reasoning Abilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs): A Comprehensive Survey on Emerging Trends in Multimodal Reasoning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2401.06805/) (2024)
- [Finding Support Examples for In-Context Learning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2302.13539/) (2023)
- [Z-ICL: Zero-Shot In-Context Learning with Pseudo-Demonstrations](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2212.09865/) (2022)
- [What Makes Multimodal In-Context Learning Work?](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.15736/) (2024)
- [Affective Image Content Analysis: Two Decades Review and New Perspectives](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2106.16125/) (2021)
- [EmoVIT: Revolutionizing Emotion Insights with Visual Instruction Tuning](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2404.16670/) (2024)
- [GPT-4V with Emotion: A Zero-shot Benchmark for Generalized Emotion Recognition](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.04293/) (2023)
- [Revisiting Multimodal Representation in Contrastive Learning: From Patch and Token Embeddings to Finite Discrete Tokens](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2303.14865/) (2023)
- [How to Configure Good In-Context Sequence for Visual Question Answering](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2312.01571/) (2023)
- [Learning Emotion Representations from Verbal and Nonverbal Communication](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2305.13500/) (2023)

## Built on by (most cited first, 4 of 4)

- [EmoCaliber: Advancing Reliable Visual Emotion Comprehension via Confidence Verbalization and Calibration](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2512.15528/) (2025)
- [Customizing Visual Emotion Evaluation for MLLMs: An Open-vocabulary, Multifaceted, and Scalable Approach](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2509.21950/) (2025)
- [Why Multimodal In-Context Learning Lags Behind? Unveiling the Inner Mechanisms and Bottlenecks](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2604.13403/) (2026)
- [MVEI & EmObserver: Empowering MLLM-Oriented Visual Emotional Intelligence via Emotion Statement Judgement](https://mlsanity.com/paper/2607.21061/) (2026)

## Abstract (arXiv)

The advancements in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have enabled various multimodal tasks to be addressed under a zero-shot paradigm. This paradigm sidesteps the cost of model fine-tuning, emerging as a dominant trend in practical application. Nevertheless, Multimodal Sentiment Analysis (MSA), a pivotal challenge in the quest for general artificial intelligence, fails to accommodate this convenience. The zero-shot paradigm exhibits undesirable performance on MSA, casting doubt on whether MLLMs can perceive sentiments as competent as supervised models. By extending the zero-shot paradigm to In-Context Learning (ICL) and conducting an in-depth study on configuring demonstrations, we validate that MLLMs indeed possess such capability. Specifically, three key factors that cover demonstrations' retrieval, presentation, and distribution are comprehensively investigated and optimized. A sentimental predictive bias inherent in MLLMs is also discovered and later effectively counteracted. By complementing each other, the devised strategies for three factors result in average accuracy improvements of 15.9% on six MSA datasets against the zero-shot paradigm and 11.2% against the random ICL baseline.